- From: Francisco Monteiro <monterro2004@tiscali.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 15:19:16 +0100
- To: <www-forms@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 1 September 2006 14:19:34 UTC
The current debate reminds me of SOA 2.0 and Grid 2.0. What's really driving SOA 2.0 and Grid 2.0 is hollow, buzzword-based marketing by companies trying to stand out in overpopulated and immature markets. On SOA, we have a general, high-level consensus in the absence of a single standards-based definition. The inherent problem with Grid 2.0 is the philosophy behind grids has always been about harnessing distributed computing power. In other words, Grid 2.0 is grid 1.0 because it re-treads an accepted concept by just adding more stuff. I seem to remember doing distributed computing 14 years ago. As I mentioned both XForms and Web Forms 2.0 can exist as client side technology, I use XForms and Dojo and Yahoo UI each one has a place the question is determining where and when to use the best of what the technology offers. Francisco facileXForms - really AJAX at heart
Received on Friday, 1 September 2006 14:19:34 UTC