- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 11:00:01 -0700
- To: public-appformats@w3.org, www-forms@w3.org
Received on Friday, 1 September 2006 18:00:22 UTC
On Friday 2006-09-01 10:03 -0700, T.V Raman wrote: > It's always been a mystery to me as to why people advocating > tag-soup continuation assert "we can build a DOM from tag-soup" > but then immediately insist on never doing failure recovery when > parsing xhtml. Because one set of undocumented non-interoperable tag soup parsing rules is more than enough? If there were a spec defining exactly what errors were corrected and how, then it would be much more reasonable. Of course, there already is such a spec -- XML 1.0 -- and it says [1]: # Once a fatal error is detected, however, the processor MUST NOT # continue normal processing (i.e., it MUST NOT continue to pass # character data and information about the document's logical structure # to the application in the normal way). -David [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-20060816/#dt-fatal -- L. David Baron <URL: http://dbaron.org/ > Technical Lead, Layout & CSS, Mozilla Corporation
Received on Friday, 1 September 2006 18:00:22 UTC