w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org from March 2002 by date

Sunday, 31 March 2002

• apologies for April 5 teleconference Frank Manola
• Re: application/rdf+xml Media Type Registration [DRAFT] Aaron Swartz

Saturday, 30 March 2002

• Re: completion of action 2002-01-11#2 Jos De_Roo
• Re: completion of action 2002-01-11#2 Brian McBride

Friday, 29 March 2002

• Re: completion of action 2002-01-11#2 Jos De_Roo
• Re: xmlbase error1 Dan Connolly
• Re: xmlbase error1 Dave Beckett
• RE: xmlbase error1 Dan Connolly
• completion of action 2002-01-11#2 Brian McBride

Thursday, 28 March 2002

• Re: application/rdf+xml Media Type Registration [DRAFT] Brian McBride
• Re: Schedule: datatypes document plan Patrick Stickler

Wednesday, 27 March 2002

• Re: Schedule: datatypes document plan Dave Beckett
• Fwd: Re: Schedule: datatypes document plan Graham Klyne
• More on datatypes: additional use-case Graham Klyne
• Re: Schedule: datatypes document plan Patrick Stickler

Tuesday, 26 March 2002

• Re: Last Call: draft-w3c-rdfcore-rdfxml-mediatype-00 ready to submit? Graham Klyne
• Re: Last Call: draft-w3c-rdfcore-rdfxml-mediatype-00 ready to submit? Graham Klyne
• Re: Last Call: draft-w3c-rdfcore-rdfxml-mediatype-00 ready to submit? Graham Klyne
• Re: Last Call: draft-w3c-rdfcore-rdfxml-mediatype-00 ready to submit? Aaron Swartz
• Re: Last Call: draft-w3c-rdfcore-rdfxml-mediatype-00 ready to submit? Brian McBride
• Schedule: datatypes document plan Brian McBride
• Re: Last Call: draft-w3c-rdfcore-rdfxml-mediatype-00 ready to submit? Brian McBride
• help wanted: RDF issue rdfms-assertion Brian McBride
• Last Call: draft-w3c-rdfcore-rdfxml-mediatype-00 ready to submit? Aaron Swartz

Monday, 25 March 2002

• RE: motivation for bNodes/existentials in RDF; note for parsers Jos De_Roo
• RE: motivation for bNodes/existentials in RDF; note for parsers Graham Klyne
• RE: motivation for bNodes/existentials in RDF; note for parsers Massimo Marchiori
• RE: motivation for bNodes/existentials in RDF; note for parsers Brian McBride
• RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised) 2002-03-25 Published Dave Beckett
• RE: motivation for bNodes/existentials in RDF; note for parsers Dan Connolly
• Re: [ratholes, reification, risk] poison-URIref testcases Dan Brickley
• Re: [ratholes, reification, risk] poison-URIref testcases Jan Grant
• RE: motivation for bNodes/existentials in RDF; note for parsers Jan Grant
• Re: [ratholes, reification, risk] poison-URIref testcases Dan Brickley
• RE: motivation for bNodes/existentials in RDF; note for parsers Massimo Marchiori
• Re: [ratholes, reification, risk] poison-URIref testcases Graham Klyne
• Re: [ratholes, reification, risk] poison-URIref testcases Jan Grant
• Re: [ratholes, reification, risk] poison-URIref testcases Graham Klyne
• Re: [ratholes, reification, risk] poison-URIref testcases Jan Grant
• RE: motivation for bNodes/existentials in RDF; note for parsers Jeremy Carroll
• RE: review comments on rdf-syntax-grammar (version of 25 Mar) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: [ratholes, reification, risk] poison-URIref testcases Graham Klyne
• Re: motivation for bNodes/existentials in RDF; note for parsers Patrick Stickler

Sunday, 24 March 2002

• Re: RDF/XML's legal status (was: application/rdf+xml ...) Frank Manola
• Re: review comments on rdf-syntax-grammar (version of 25 Mar) Dave Beckett
• Re: review comments on rdf-syntax-grammar (version of 25 Mar) Dan Brickley
• Re: motivation for bNodes/existentials in RDF; note for parsers Dan Brickley
• Re: motivation for bNodes/existentials in RDF; note for parsers Dave Beckett
• Re: application/rdf+xml Media Type Registration [DRAFT] Dave Beckett
• Re: review comments on rdf-syntax-grammar (version of 25 Mar) Graham Klyne
• Re: review comments on rdf-syntax-grammar (version of 25 Mar) Graham Klyne
• Re: review comments on rdf-syntax-grammar (version of 25 Mar) Dave Beckett
• Re: review comments on rdf-syntax-grammar (version of 25 Mar) Dave Beckett
• review comments on rdf-syntax-grammar (version of 25 Mar) Dan Brickley
• archiving local-drafts (www-archive reminder) Dan Brickley
• RDF/XML's legal status (was: application/rdf+xml ...) Aaron Swartz
• Re: application/rdf+xml Media Type Registration [DRAFT] Aaron Swartz

Saturday, 23 March 2002

• Re: application/rdf+xml Media Type Registration [DRAFT] Jan Grant
• Re: application/rdf+xml Media Type Registration [DRAFT] Graham Klyne
• Re: application/rdf+xml Media Type Registration [DRAFT] Graham Klyne
• motivation for bNodes/existentials in RDF; note for parsers Dan Connolly

Friday, 22 March 2002

• Re: XML Base relative URI resolution tests Aaron Swartz
• application/rdf+xml Media Type Registration [DRAFT] Aaron Swartz
• Fwd: Actions/Decisions from RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-03-22 Brian McBride
• 2002-03-22 #rdfcore telecon - raw irc log Dan Brickley
• [ratholes, reification, risk] poison-URIref testcases Dan Brickley
• Re: XML Base Graham Klyne
• RDF/XML Syntax Working Draft updates after comments Dave Beckett
• Re: XML Base Dave Beckett
• RE: IRIs as node labels (proposals and counterproposals) Dan Brickley
• RE: XML Base Jeremy Carroll
• RE: IRIs as node labels (proposals and counterproposals) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: XML Base Dave Beckett
• RE: XML Base Jeremy Carroll
• IRIs as node labels (proposals and counterproposals) Dan Brickley
• Re: XML Base Jan Grant
• Re: XML Base Dave Beckett
• RE: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-03-22 Jeremy Carroll
• RE: test cases for Issue rdfms-xml-literal-namespaces Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-03-22 Jeremy Carroll
• Updating RDF Schema spec. Dan Brickley

Thursday, 21 March 2002

• test cases for Issue rdfms-xml-literal-namespaces Brian McBride
• RDF Primer WD published Frank Manola
• Re: updated schedule to last call Frank Manola
• dataypes still lack XML examples [was: Agenda ...] Dan Connolly
• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-03-22 bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
• updated schedule to last call Brian McBride
• Re: RDF/XML Syntax Working Draft: Reviewers wanted Brian McBride
• RE: XML Base Jeremy Carroll
• RE: XML Base Brian McBride
• another observer Brian McBride
• Re: schedule to last call? Brian McBride
• Re: schedule to last call? Eric Miller
• RE: Unasserted triples, Contexts and things that go bump in the night. Dan Connolly
• Re: RDF/XML Syntax Working Draft: Reviewers wanted Dave Beckett
• Re: Telecon draft minutes: 2002-03-15 Brian McBride
• RE: Unasserted triples, Contexts and things that go bump in the night. Brian McBride
• Re: Datatyping issue, too many options? Brian McBride
• RE: XML Base Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Unasserted triples, Contexts and things that go bump in the night. Jeremy Carroll
• RE: XML Base Brian McBride
• RE: Unasserted triples, Contexts and things that go bump in the night. Brian McBride
• RE: Unasserted triples, Contexts and things that go bump in the night. Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Unasserted triples, Contexts and things that go bump in the night. Jeremy Carroll
• Re: schedule to last call? Patrick Stickler
• Re: schedule to last call? Patrick Stickler
• RE: Unasserted triples, Contexts and things that go bump in the night. Brian McBride
• RE: Unasserted triples, Contexts and things that go bump in the night. Dan Connolly
• Re: Unasserted triples, Contexts and things that go bump in the night. Dan Brickley
• Re: Unasserted triples, Contexts and things that go bump in the night. Frank Manola
• Re: Unasserted triples, Contexts and things that go bump in the night. Dan Brickley

Wednesday, 20 March 2002

• Re: Unasserted triples, Contexts and things that go bump in the night. Frank Manola
• Re: Unasserted triples, Contexts and things that go bump in the night. Brian McBride
• Re: Unasserted triples, Contexts and things that go bump in the night. Jonathan Borden
• RE: Unasserted triples, Contexts and things that go bump in the night. Brian McBride
• RE: Unasserted triples, Contexts and things that go bump in the night. Brian McBride
• RE: Unasserted triples, Contexts and things that go bump in the night. Brian McBride
• RE: Unasserted triples, Contexts and things that go bump in the night. Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Unasserted triples, Contexts and things that go bump in the night. Graham Klyne
• Re: Unasserted triples, Contexts and things that go bump in the night. Patrick Stickler
• RE: XML Base Graham Klyne
• Re: Unasserted triples, Contexts and things that go bump in the night. Graham Klyne
• Re: Unasserted triples, Contexts and things that go bump in the night. Graham Klyne
• RE: Unasserted triples, Contexts and things that go bump in the night. Jeremy Carroll
• RE: schedule to last call? Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Unasserted triples, Contexts and things that go bump in the night. Dave Beckett
• Re: Unasserted triples, Contexts and things that go bump in the night. Patrick Stickler
• Re: Unasserted triples, Contexts and things that go bump in the night. Patrick Stickler
• Re: schedule to last call? Jos De_Roo
• RE: Unasserted triples, Contexts and things that go bump in the night. Jeremy Carroll
• RE: RDF/XML Syntax Working Draft: Reviewers wanted Jeremy Carroll
• schedule to last call? Brian McBride
• Re: Unasserted triples, Contexts and things that go bump in the night. Patrick Stickler
• RE: Unasserted triples, Contexts and things that go bump in the night. Jeremy Carroll
• RE: XML Base Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Unasserted triples, Contexts and things that go bump in the night. Jos De_Roo
• Unasserted triples, Contexts and things that go bump in the night. Pat Hayes
• Re: RDF/XML Syntax Working Draft: Reviewers wanted Dave Beckett

Tuesday, 19 March 2002

• ACTION 2002-03-15#2 Frank Manola
• Re: Datatyping issue, too many options? Graham Klyne
• Fwd: Re[2]: Summary: Section 2: What does a URI identify? Graham Klyne
• Re: Trying to make sense of range and drange Graham Klyne
• RDF/XML Syntax Working Draft: Reviewers wanted Dave Beckett
• XML Base and XML Infoset Dave Beckett
• Re: A very short list of residual datatyping issues (just one ;-) Patrick Stickler
• Re: Datatyping issue, too many options? Patrick Stickler
• Re: Datatyping issue, too many options? Patrick Stickler

Sunday, 17 March 2002

• Re: Trying to make sense of range and drange Pat Hayes
• Re: Datatyping issue, too many options? Pat Hayes
• Re: Datatyping issue, too many options? Pat Hayes
• RE: possible way out of maze? [was: Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstan ding Issues ]] Pat Hayes
• Re: A very short list of residual datatyping issues (just one ;-) Pat Hayes

Monday, 18 March 2002

• RE: Changes to rdfms-empty-property-elements tests Jeremy Carroll
• Changes to rdfms-empty-property-elements tests Dave Beckett
• Telecon draft minutes: 2002-03-15 Jan Grant

Friday, 15 March 2002

• Re: NTriples proposed changes summary Tim Berners-Lee
• Updated NTriples / RDF Test Cases editors draft Dave Beckett
• Re: Proposed NTriples changes for literal notation Patrick Stickler
• Re: NTriples proposed changes summary Dan Connolly
• Re: NTriples proposed changes summary Dave Beckett
• Re: Primer: slight revision Frank Manola
• Re: NTriples proposed changes summary Graham Klyne
• RE: xmlbase error1 Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Weekly Call for Agenda Items Frank Manola
• RE: Proposed NTriples changes for literal notation Graham Klyne
• Trying to make sense of range and drange Graham Klyne
• NTriples proposed changes summary Dave Beckett
• Re: Primer: slight revision Dave Beckett
• Re: xmlbase error1 Dave Beckett
• RE: xmlbase error1 Jos De_Roo
• xml literal (was RE: Weekly Call for Agenda Items) Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Weekly Call for Agenda Items Jeremy Carroll
• RE: xmlbase error1 Jos De_Roo
• RE: Proposed NTriples changes for literal notation Jeremy Carroll
• nested bag id's response Brian McBride
• Primer: slight revision Frank Manola

Thursday, 14 March 2002

• Re: Proposed NTriples changes for literal notation Jos De_Roo
• Re: Proposed NTriples changes for literal notation Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: Proposed NTriples changes for literal notation Patrick Stickler
• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-03-15 bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
• Re: Proposed NTriples changes for literal notation Seth Russell
• RE: Weekly Call for Agenda Items Brian McBride
• regrets Dan Brickley
• RE: xmlbase error1 Jeremy Carroll
• Clarification of I18N issues (was RE: Weekly Call for Agenda Items) Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Weekly Call for Agenda Items Jeremy Carroll
• RE: rdfms-xmllang - text for a note Jeremy Carroll
• RE: rdfms-xmllang - text for a note Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Proposed Dates for June face to face meeting Frank Manola
• Re: rdfms-xmllang - text for a note Frank Manola
• RE: Weekly Call for Agenda Items Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Weekly Call for Agenda Items Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Weekly Call for Agenda Items Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Proposed NTriples changes for literal notation Graham Klyne
• Re: Proposed NTriples changes for literal notation Jan Grant
• RE: xmlbase error1 Brian McBride
• Proposed Dates for June face to face meeting Brian McBride
• Re: Proposed NTriples changes for literal notation Brian McBride
• Re: rdfms-xmllang - text for a note Martin Duerst
• Re: Datatyping XML Examples Brian McBride
• Re: Open eBook Forum XPackage published Brian McBride
• Re: Primer: new version Martyn Horner
• Re: Proposed NTriples changes for literal notation Dave Beckett
• Re: rdfms-xmllang - text for a note Brian McBride
• Re: Proposed NTriples changes for literal notation Patrick Stickler
• Re: A very short list of residual datatyping issues (just one ;-) Patrick Stickler
• Re: A very short list of residual datatyping issues (just one ;-) Patrick Stickler

Wednesday, 13 March 2002

• Re: Proposed NTriples changes for literal notation Tim Berners-Lee

Thursday, 14 March 2002

• Re: Primer: new version Frank Manola

Wednesday, 13 March 2002

• Re: Fragment identifier use case (was 2002-02-25#19, Fragment identif iers, words for the primer) Aaron Swartz
• Re: Primer: new version Graham Klyne
• Re: Primer: new version Dan Connolly
• Re: Primer: new version Brian McBride
• Weekly Call for Agenda Items Brian McBride
• Fragment identifier use case (was 2002-02-25#19, Fragment identif iers, words for the primer) Ronald Daniel
• Re: xmlbase error1 Graham Klyne
• Re: xmlbase error1 Graham Klyne
• Re: A very short list of residual datatyping issues (just one ;-) Graham Klyne
• Re: A very short list of residual datatyping issues (just one ;-) Graham Klyne
• Re: xmlbase error1 Graham Klyne
• Re: xmlbase -ve to +ve Graham Klyne
• Re: xml literal and xslt Mike Dean
• RE: xmlbase error1 Jeremy Carroll
• RE: xmlbase error1 Jeremy Carroll
• Re: xmlbase error1 Dave Beckett
• xmlbase error1 Jeremy Carroll
• Re: A very short list of residual datatyping issues (just one ;-) Patrick Stickler
• xmlbase -ve to +ve Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Minutes for 2002-03-08 RDF Core Telecon (draft) Jeremy Carroll
• RE: xml literal and xslt Jeremy Carroll
• RE: xml literal and xslt (resend) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Open eBook Forum XPackage published Patrick Stickler
• Re: Datatyping issue, too many options? Patrick Stickler
• Re: A very short list of residual datatyping issues (just one ;-) Patrick Stickler
• Re: A very short list of residual datatyping issues (just one ;-) Patrick Stickler
• Primer: new version Frank Manola

Tuesday, 12 March 2002

• Re: Open eBook Forum XPackage published Frank Manola
• Re: 2002-02-25#19, Fragment identifiers, words for the primer Graham Klyne
• Re: xml literal and xslt (resend) Dave Beckett
• Re: A very short list of residual datatyping issues (just one ;-) Jos De_Roo
• Re: A very short list of residual datatyping issues (just one ;-) Graham Klyne
• Re: 2002-02-25#19, Fragment identifiers, words for the primer Aaron Swartz
• Re: 2002-02-25#19, Fragment identifiers, words for the primer Graham Klyne
• Re: 2002-02-25#19, Fragment identifiers, words for the primer Aaron Swartz
• RE: 2002-02-25#19, Fragment identifiers, words for the primer Jeremy Carroll
• Re: 2002-02-25#19, Fragment identifiers, words for the primer Aaron Swartz
• xmlbase testcases jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• Re: xmlbase testcases Dominique Hazaël-Massieux
• Re: xml literal and xslt Brian McBride
• Re: xml literal and xslt (resend) Brian McBride
• Re: A very short list of residual datatyping issues (just one ;-) Brian McBride
• Re: Notes from RDFCore/I18N meeting Brian McBride
• Re: A very short list of residual datatyping issues (just one ;-) Patrick Stickler
• Re: A very short list of residual datatyping issues (just one ;-) Patrick Stickler
• Re: Notes from RDFCore/I18N meeting Misha.Wolf@reuters.com
• Re: rdfs:Literal not rdfs:subClassOf rdfs:Resource Dan Connolly
• Re: A very short list of residual datatyping issues (just one ;-) Brian McBride
• RE: NFC and RDF Security consideration Jeremy Carroll
• Re: A very short list of residual datatyping issues (just one ;-) Graham Klyne
• Datatyping issue, too many options? Graham Klyne
• Datatyping XML Examples Patrick Stickler
• Open eBook Forum XPackage published Patrick Stickler
• RE: charmod literal Jeremy Carroll
• Re: rdfs:Literal not rdfs:subClassOf rdfs:Resource Patrick Stickler
• Minutes for 2002-03-08 RDF Core Telecon (draft) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: A very short list of residual datatyping issues (just one ;-) Patrick Stickler
• Re: rdfs:Literal not rdfs:subClassOf rdfs:Resource Patrick Stickler
• Re: NFC and RDF Security consideration Martin Duerst

Sunday, 10 March 2002

• xml literal and xslt Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Proposed NTriples changes for literal notation Jeremy Carroll
• Re: A very short list of residual datatyping issues (just one ;-) jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
• Re: Literal notation for NTriples Graham Klyne

Monday, 11 March 2002

• Re: A very short list of residual datatyping issues (just one ;-) Brian McBride
• Re: rdfs:Literal not rdfs:subClassOf rdfs:Resource Brian McBride
• RE: xml literal and xslt (resend) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Proposed NTriples changes for literal notation Patrick Stickler
• Re: xml literal and xslt (resend) Dave Beckett
• Re: Proposed NTriples changes for literal notation Dave Beckett
• Re: Proposed NTriples changes for literal notation Patrick Stickler
• Re: A very short list of residual datatyping issues (just one ;-) Patrick Stickler
• Re: Proposed NTriples changes for literal notation Dave Beckett
• RE: Proposed NTriples changes for literal notation Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Proposed NTriples changes for literal notation Dave Beckett
• Re: Proposed NTriples changes for literal notation Dave Beckett
• RE: Proposed NTriples changes for literal notation Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Proposed NTriples changes for literal notation Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Proposed NTriples changes for literal notation Dave Beckett
• RE: xml literal and xslt (resend) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: xml literal and xslt (resend) Graham Klyne
• xml literal and xslt (resend) Jeremy Carroll

Saturday, 9 March 2002

• Re: Literal notation for NTriples Dan Connolly

Friday, 8 March 2002

• Re: rdfs:Literal not rdfs:subClassOf rdfs:Resource Dan Connolly
• Re: Proposed NTriples changes for literal notation Dave Beckett
• WebOnt WD: Requirements for a Web Ontology Language Dave Beckett
• rdfs:Literal not rdfs:subClassOf rdfs:Resource Patrick Stickler
• Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] A. Vine
• Re: Proposed NTriples changes for literal notation Graham Klyne
• Proposed NTriples changes for literal notation Dave Beckett
• A very short list of residual datatyping issues (just one ;-) Patrick Stickler
• charmod literal Jeremy Carroll
• Literal notation for NTriples Patrick Stickler
• Re: RDF Test Cases updates Jos De_Roo
• Re: rdfms-fragments decision Graham Klyne
• RE: 2002-02-25#19, Fragment identifiers, words for the primer Graham Klyne
• RE: 2002-02-25#19, Fragment identifiers, words for the primer Jeremy Carroll
• RE: RDF Test Cases updates Jeremy Carroll
• RDF Test Cases updates Dave Beckett
• Re: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-03-08 Patrick Stickler
• RE: Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-03-08 Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Minutes of F2F Jeremy Carroll
• RE: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Jeremy Carroll
• RE: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Brian McBride
• Re: Minutes of F2F Brian McBride
• RE: 2002-02-25#19, Fragment identifiers, words for the primer Jeremy Carroll
• Re: rdfms-fragments decision Brian McBride
• Re: rdfms-fragments decision Dan Connolly
• RE: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Martin Duerst
• Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Martin Duerst
• rdfms-fragments decision Aaron Swartz

Thursday, 7 March 2002

• Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2002-03-08 bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
• Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Misha.Wolf@reuters.com
• RE: Weekly call for agenda items - xml literal Bill de hOra
• Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] A. Vine
• Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] John Cowan
• 2002-02-25#19, Fragment identifiers, words for the primer Graham Klyne
• regrets, tomorrow's telecon Jan Grant
• Re: Test case permissions bug Dan Connolly
• Test case permissions bug Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Minutes of F2F Graham Klyne
• RE: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Misha.Wolf@reuters.com
• RE: Weekly call for agenda items - I18N Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Weekly call for agenda items - xml literal Jeremy Carroll
• RE: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Jeremy Carroll
• RE: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Martin Duerst

Wednesday, 6 March 2002

• Minutes of F2F Brian McBride
• Re: RDF C14N Inclusive or Exclusive Joseph Reagle
• Weekly call for agenda items Brian McBride
• RE: RDF C14N Inclusive or Exclusive Jeremy Carroll
• Re: RDF C14N Inclusive or Exclusive Joseph Reagle

Tuesday, 5 March 2002

• actions now on f2f page Brian McBride
• RE: RDF C14N Inclusive or Exclusive Jeremy Carroll
• RE: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Rick Jelliffe

Monday, 4 March 2002

• Monadic predicates and disjointness of properties and classes Graham Klyne
• Re: RDF C14N Max or Min Graham Klyne
• RDF C14N Max or Min Jeremy Carroll
• RDF C14N XML Literal Equality Jeremy Carroll
• Re: rdf-schema encoding Dan Brickley
• Re: RDF C14N Inclusive or Exclusive Joseph Reagle
• RDF C14N InclusiveNamespaces Jeremy Carroll
• RE: RDF C14N Inclusive or Exclusive Jeremy Carroll
• RDF C14N Inclusive or Exclusive Jeremy Carroll
• RE: RDF C14N Comments Jeremy Carroll
• Re: RDF C14N Comments Eric Miller
• RDF XML Canonicalization Intro Jeremy Carroll
• RDF C14N Comments Jeremy Carroll
• RE: lang and safe sex Jeremy Carroll
• RE: NFC and RDF Security consideration Jeremy Carroll
• RDF & XML Literals: Intro Jeremy Carroll
• RDF & enveloping of XML structures Jeremy Carroll
• xml:lang + DC Jeremy Carroll
• charmod-uri: Proposed question Jeremy Carroll
• xml:lang and safe sex Patrick Stickler
• NFC and RDF Security consideration Jeremy Carroll
• Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Graham Klyne

Sunday, 3 March 2002

• Re: Regrets Frank Manola
• Regrets Sergey Melnik

Saturday, 2 March 2002

• TEST: entailment test cases jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com

Friday, 1 March 2002

• RE: possible way out of maze? [was: Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstan ding Issues ]] Jeremy Carroll
• RE: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Jeremy Carroll
• Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] A. Vine
• Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Pat Hayes
• RE: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Jeremy Carroll
• RE: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Jeremy Carroll
• Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Pat Hayes
• Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Pat Hayes
• rdfms-nested-bagIDs test cases Jeremy Carroll
• not-id-and-resource-attr test cases Jeremy Carroll
• URI escaping in RDF M&S Jeremy Carroll
• charmod-literal Jeremy Carroll
• RE: a few questions about literals Bill de hÓra
• Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Pat Hayes
• Re: revised datatyping proposal, now twopence colored Brian McBride
• Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Graham Klyne
• Re: rdfms-xmllang - text for a note Martyn Horner
• rdfms-xmllang - text for a note Jeremy Carroll
• reminder: no telecon this week Brian McBride
• Re: a few questions about literals Brian McBride
• Re: a few questions about literals Jan Grant

Thursday, 28 February 2002

• Re: simplified datatyping proposal Brian McBride

Friday, 1 March 2002

• Re: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ] Patrick Stickler

Last message date: Sunday, 31 March 2002 14:52:36 UTC