- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 13:42:17 +0000
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
At 22:28 20/03/2002 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote: [...] >Oh... but more substantively: >the hassle of dealing with an infinite number >of rdf:_1 rdf:_2 things. Hmmm. Its been proposed we make all those subproperties of some common super property, e.g. rdf:member. Is there anything we are likely to want to say about any rdf:_nnn that is not true of rdfs:member. Would that deal with this, or am I missing the point? Brian
Received on Thursday, 21 March 2002 08:44:34 UTC