- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 13:04:01 -0000
- To: "Dave Beckett" <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
> > >>>Jeremy Carroll said: > > > > > > From RFC 2396 section 5 > > > > [[ > > Some URI schemes do not allow a hierarchical syntax matching the > > <hier_part> syntax, and thus cannot use relative references. > > ]] > > > > I think that that justifies xmlbase/error001.rdf as an error. > > Perhaps the above quote need to be added to the file. > > DaveB: > Isn't this implying (since it is an error case) that RDF applications > have to validate URI-refs or at least know some non-hierarchical uri > schemes. I understand RDF apps need to do relative URI resolution > but until the xmlbase test cases, we never checked that they worked > right. Yes your right. I am convinced. I will switch error1 to positive. > > We seem to be sort-of generating test cases for other specifications > (RFC 2396, xml base) which we generally shouldn't be doing :) > Hmmm... that's food for thought. Jeremy
Received on Wednesday, 13 March 2002 08:05:52 UTC