- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 15:42:23 +0000
- To: RDF core WG <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
This came from Chris Lilley on the TAG mailing list: > > Removed examples of use of xml:base > > > In line with the recent decision from the RDF Core working group on > > the use of xml:base in RDF 1.0 descriptions[cite], PRISM has changed > > its advice to implementers. Where the 1.0 version stated that > > implementers should be cautious about using it, the 1.0.1 version > > states that creators of PRISM descriptions SHOULD NOT use it. The > > examples that did use it were changed. > >Unfortunately the [cite] appears to be a placeholder and not an actual >link . I also note an RDF usage of RDF:about="" to mean 'the current >file' and I have seen usage (not in RDF) of xmlns:"" to mean "blow >off an existing namespace declaration and make unprefixed stuff in >this element be anonymous, not in any namespace" which broadly >translates to using the current document as the namespace. Or not... #g ------------------- Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Tuesday, 19 March 2002 11:07:50 UTC