- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 12:06:44 +0000
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
>>>Jeremy Carroll said: > > > From RFC 2396 section 5 > > [[ > Some URI schemes do not allow a hierarchical syntax matching the > <hier_part> syntax, and thus cannot use relative references. > ]] > > I think that that justifies xmlbase/error001.rdf as an error. > Perhaps the above quote need to be added to the file. Isn't this implying (since it is an error case) that RDF applications have to validate URI-refs or at least know some non-hierarchical uri schemes. I understand RDF apps need to do relative URI resolution but until the xmlbase test cases, we never checked that they worked right. We seem to be sort-of generating test cases for other specifications (RFC 2396, xml base) which we generally shouldn't be doing :) > <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" > xmlns:eg="http://example.org/" > xml:base="mailto:Jeremy_Carroll@hp.com"> > > <eg:type rdf:about="relfile" /> > > </rdf:RDF> and urn:, isbn: etc. etc. Dave
Received on Wednesday, 13 March 2002 07:09:56 UTC