- From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 12:51:55 +0000
- To: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: "Dave Beckett" <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 10:17 AM 3/20/02 +0000, Jeremy Carroll wrote: >Seems like a proposal to: > >- draw the relevant XML wg's attention to difficulties in interpretating >xml:base with same document references, (particularly when the base is a >URIref). > >- select the xml:base test cases that: > - test general URI resolution > - test general xml:base behaviour > and mark them as non-normative I think this proposal opens a deeper question: are any of the test cases normative? My concern is about having multiple documents providing the same information normatively. In particular, if a test case is found to conflict with specification text, which takes precedence? #g ------------------- Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Wednesday, 20 March 2002 08:13:10 UTC