- From: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>
- Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2002 19:57:09 -0600
- To: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>, Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
- CC: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On 2002-03-23 5:17 AM, "Jan Grant" <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk> wrote: >>> It is important to note that RDF language is used to transmit >>> meaningful information, and thus has the same legal status as >>> assertions, in say, English would. >> I strongly suggest dropping this last paragraph. If there's anything >> likely to snarl up approval through IETF/IESG/IANA processes, I think this >> is it. And it's not necessary to make this point for registering the >> content type. > > I'd agree with Graham here; actually, I'd go further. RDF does _not_ > have the same legal status as written English assertions until test > cases say it does. Test cases, hm. Anyone wanna volunteer to get sued? ;-) -- "Aaron Swartz" | The Semantic Web <mailto:me@aaronsw.com> | <http://logicerror.com/semanticWeb-long> <http://www.aaronsw.com/> | i'm working to make it happen
Received on Saturday, 23 March 2002 20:57:11 UTC