Re: A very short list of residual datatyping issues (just one ;-) from Brian McBride on 2002-03-12 (w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org from March 2002)

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 13:01:26 +0000
To: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020312125854.03167620@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com>

At 13:03 12/03/2002 +0200, Patrick Stickler wrote:
[...]
>Given
>
>    age rdfs:range xsd:integer .
>
>Then
>
>    Bob age [ a xsd:integer; xsd:integer "35" ] .
>
>works OK, since the bNode is a member of the value
>space of xsd:integer; but
>
>    Bob age "35" .
>
>generates a range constraint conflict since "35" is
>a member of the lexical space, not value space of
>xsd:integer.
>
>This problem does not exist with a union interpretation.

If that is what you want, wouldn't one say:

   age rdfs:drange xsd:integer?

Sorry for being thick, but I still don't see the problem.

Brian

Received on Tuesday, 12 March 2002 08:04:08 UTC