- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 19:01:14 +0000
- To: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
- cc: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>, w3c-rdfcore-wg <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
>>>Graham Klyne said:
> At 07:11 AM 3/24/02 -0500, Dan Brickley wrote:
> >I've been thinking about strategies for dealing with 'unserializable'
> >graphs. These are (AFAIK) all (or nearly all?? would be good to be clear)
> >to do with having the edges in some RDF graph be labelled with a URIref
> >that doesn't split conveniently into namespace name and local name.
>
> Other such graphs are literals in subject position,
Not allowed at present in the model^Wgraph.
> ...and two different
> properties with different subjects having the same blank node as
> object. Ther may be more.
Yes.
Jeremy goes through this in more detail in:
Unparsing RDF/XML by Jeremy Carroll,
HP Labs Technical Report, HPL-2001-294, 2001
http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2001/HPL-2001-294.html.
Dave
Received on Sunday, 24 March 2002 14:01:16 UTC