- From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 12:12:21 +0000
- To: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 10:05 AM 3/25/02 +0000, Jan Grant wrote: >On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, Graham Klyne wrote: > > > I would argue that the "meaning" of some RDF is not the "conjunction of the > > meaning of individual triples". Conjunction of "meaning" seems to be a > > meaningless (er, ill-defined) idea. It is the _truth_ under some > > interpretation that is a conjunction. > >Unfortunately, that bit of the conversation seems to be missing from >Dan's quoted text. OK. >Dan's concern might be summarised as: "...but what if a URI _doesn't_ I >any R?" :-) By which I assume you mean have a mapping I(URI) in IR ? I think the definition of an interpretation requires that such a mapping exists (irrespective of whatever may be happen in the "real Web"). #g ------------------- Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Monday, 25 March 2002 07:18:06 UTC