- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 16:27:45 +0000
- To: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, "Pat Hayes" <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Cc: "RDF Core" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, "Massimo Marchiori" <massimo@w3.org>, "Lynn Andrea Stein" <las@olin.edu>
At 09:58 25/03/2002 +0000, Jeremy Carroll wrote: [...] >PS: As an implementator I am certainly game for implementing something along >these lines, and I think a URI scheme is better than extensions of a >well-known URI. If we are going to call it a URI it had better be a URI. Does the 'U' in URI stand for uniform and does that mean multiple occurences of a URI must denote the same thing regardless of context? Brian
Received on Monday, 25 March 2002 11:30:36 UTC