- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 18:00:15 -0000
- To: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CEECKEAMDAJDDEDGJNBEKEBMCAAA.jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Hi, here are the test cases. The last three are a new format of test case. The orignal example ==================== 1. The orig example (DaveB) 2. The orig example flattened (DaveB) 3. modified version of 1 (clarifying what happens when no rdf:ID) 4. modified version of 1 (clarifying that non-nested bagID has same semantics) Dave: I have put your name on 1 & 2 and both our names on 3 & 4. Is this OK? Systematic exercise of cases ============================ 5. rdf:Description 6. typed node 7. empty element with rdf:resource 8. empty element with rdf:ID 9. empty element with neither (note: the version of ARP I have on this laptop failed 7. but not 8. or 9.) Two prop attrs ============== 10. rdf:Description + two prop attrs 11. typed node + two propattrs 12. empty element + two prop attrs Test cases 10, 11 and 12 each have two possible answers. To pass the test case an RDF/XML to N-triple converter needs to get one or the other.
Attachments
- application/x-zip-compressed attachment: rdfms-nested-bagIDs.zip
Received on Friday, 1 March 2002 13:00:34 UTC