- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 18:00:15 -0000
- To: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CEECKEAMDAJDDEDGJNBEKEBMCAAA.jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Hi,
here are the test cases.
The last three are a new format of test case.
The orignal example
====================
1. The orig example (DaveB)
2. The orig example flattened (DaveB)
3. modified version of 1
(clarifying what happens when no rdf:ID)
4. modified version of 1
(clarifying that non-nested bagID has same semantics)
Dave: I have put your name on 1 & 2 and both our names on 3 & 4.
Is this OK?
Systematic exercise of cases
============================
5. rdf:Description
6. typed node
7. empty element with rdf:resource
8. empty element with rdf:ID
9. empty element with neither
(note: the version of ARP I have on this laptop failed 7. but not 8. or 9.)
Two prop attrs
==============
10. rdf:Description + two prop attrs
11. typed node + two propattrs
12. empty element + two prop attrs
Test cases 10, 11 and 12 each have two possible answers.
To pass the test case an RDF/XML to N-triple converter needs to get one or
the other.
Attachments
- application/x-zip-compressed attachment: rdfms-nested-bagIDs.zip
Received on Friday, 1 March 2002 13:00:34 UTC