Re: completion of action 2002-01-11#2

> I just took a trawl through the closed issues to check which ones we have
> test cases for, and as side effect claim I've completed Jan's action.  My
> analysis is attached.  I'd appreciate someone checking it.
>
> The summary is:
>
>    we need test cases for:
>      rdfms-xml-literal-namespaces
>      rdfms-xmllang
>      rdfms-rdf-names-use (DaveB - you may have done these and I didn't
find
> them)
>      rdfms-abouteach (to show whether its illegal or just a warning)
>      rdfs-subPropertyOf-semantics
>
> there are some others to be approved, a couple of special cases to be
> resolved and the WD lists need updating.
>
> Please can I have volunteers to prepare these test cases.

I will try to come up with one for
http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfs-subPropertyOf-semantics

> We also need to update the WD with a description of the different types
of
> tests.  So  far, I've spotted:
>
>    parser tests:     rdf/xml   -> n-triples
>    parser warnings:  rdf/xml   -> n-triples
>    parser errors:    rdf/xml
>    seralizer tests:  n-triples -> rdf/xml
>    rdf entailment:
>    rdfs entailment:
>    rdf non-entailment:
>    rdfs non-entailment:
>
> and a description of the manifest file structure.
>
> Jan/Jos - you've done some work on this; I was wondering if you could
> provide some pointers.

one pointer, also due to Jeremy, is
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Mar/0102.html
BTW, our current entailment test case description uses lists,
but the list topic will be discussed next week or so

Have a nice Easter, to all of you!

--
Jos

PS there seem to be some mis-pointers in
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Mar/att-0381/01-testcases-analysis.html