W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > March 2002

Re: completion of action 2002-01-11#2

From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 23:45:16 +0100
To: "Brian McBride <bwm" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: "RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OF898BE9EF.97E8BF1A-ONC1256B8B.007A9BBE@agfa.be>

> I just took a trawl through the closed issues to check which ones we have
> test cases for, and as side effect claim I've completed Jan's action.  My
> analysis is attached.  I'd appreciate someone checking it.
> The summary is:
>    we need test cases for:
>      rdfms-xml-literal-namespaces
>      rdfms-xmllang
>      rdfms-rdf-names-use (DaveB - you may have done these and I didn't
> them)
>      rdfms-abouteach (to show whether its illegal or just a warning)
>      rdfs-subPropertyOf-semantics
> there are some others to be approved, a couple of special cases to be
> resolved and the WD lists need updating.
> Please can I have volunteers to prepare these test cases.

I will try to come up with one for

> We also need to update the WD with a description of the different types
> tests.  So  far, I've spotted:
>    parser tests:     rdf/xml   -> n-triples
>    parser warnings:  rdf/xml   -> n-triples
>    parser errors:    rdf/xml
>    seralizer tests:  n-triples -> rdf/xml
>    rdf entailment:
>    rdfs entailment:
>    rdf non-entailment:
>    rdfs non-entailment:
> and a description of the manifest file structure.
> Jan/Jos - you've done some work on this; I was wondering if you could
> provide some pointers.

one pointer, also due to Jeremy, is
BTW, our current entailment test case description uses lists,
but the list topic will be discussed next week or so

Have a nice Easter, to all of you!


PS there seem to be some mis-pointers in
Received on Friday, 29 March 2002 17:45:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:11 UTC