- From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 23:45:16 +0100
- To: "Brian McBride <bwm" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: "RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
> I just took a trawl through the closed issues to check which ones we have > test cases for, and as side effect claim I've completed Jan's action. My > analysis is attached. I'd appreciate someone checking it. > > The summary is: > > we need test cases for: > rdfms-xml-literal-namespaces > rdfms-xmllang > rdfms-rdf-names-use (DaveB - you may have done these and I didn't find > them) > rdfms-abouteach (to show whether its illegal or just a warning) > rdfs-subPropertyOf-semantics > > there are some others to be approved, a couple of special cases to be > resolved and the WD lists need updating. > > Please can I have volunteers to prepare these test cases. I will try to come up with one for http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfs-subPropertyOf-semantics > We also need to update the WD with a description of the different types of > tests. So far, I've spotted: > > parser tests: rdf/xml -> n-triples > parser warnings: rdf/xml -> n-triples > parser errors: rdf/xml > seralizer tests: n-triples -> rdf/xml > rdf entailment: > rdfs entailment: > rdf non-entailment: > rdfs non-entailment: > > and a description of the manifest file structure. > > Jan/Jos - you've done some work on this; I was wondering if you could > provide some pointers. one pointer, also due to Jeremy, is http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Mar/0102.html BTW, our current entailment test case description uses lists, but the list topic will be discussed next week or so Have a nice Easter, to all of you! -- Jos PS there seem to be some mis-pointers in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Mar/att-0381/01-testcases-analysis.html
Received on Friday, 29 March 2002 17:45:54 UTC