- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 13:38:16 -0000
- To: "Martin Duerst" <duerst@w3.org>, "Martyn Horner" <martyn.horner@profium.com>
- Cc: "John Cowan" <jcowan@reutershealth.com>, <Misha.Wolf@reuters.com>, <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Martin: > >What are your `other contexts'? I guess you mean non-RDF contexts by the > >(I hope) all-inclusive `when interpreting an RDF graph > >according to the RDF model theory'. I am anxious to make the point that > >the same transitive equivalence criteria are used throughout RDF > >construction and querying (and hence in the construction of queries in > >any query language). > The word "interpreting" is used as "interpreting according to the RDF model theory". Model theory in general uses the word 'interpretation' as a very narrowly defined technical term. The note was using the word "interpreting" in that narrow context and *not* an all-inclusive way. Jeremy
Received on Thursday, 14 March 2002 08:39:15 UTC