- From: Martyn Horner <martyn.horner@profium.com>
- Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 16:19:49 +0100
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- CC: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>, Misha.Wolf@reuters.com, bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com, w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Jeremy Carroll wrote: > Thus I propose that text such as the following is included near the > definition of literal equality: > > [[[ > > NOTE: This definition of equality is appropriate when constructing an RDF > graph, when checking an RDF test case, and when interpreting an RDF graph > according to the RDF model theory. In other contexts it is usually more > appropriate to use the methods described in RFC 3066 treating a missing > language tag as "*". > > ]]] Jeremy, What are your `other contexts'? I guess you mean non-RDF contexts by the (I hope) all-inclusive `when interpreting an RDF graph according to the RDF model theory'. I am anxious to make the point that the same transitive equivalence criteria are used throughout RDF construction and querying (and hence in the construction of queries in any query language). -- Martyn Horner <martyn.horner@profium.com> Profium, Les Espaces de Sophia, Immeuble Delta, B.P. 037, F-06901 Sophia-Antipolis, France Tel. +33 (0)4.93.95.31.44 Fax. +33 (0)4.93.95.52.58 Mob. +33 (0)6.21.01.54.56 Internet: http://www.profium.com
Received on Friday, 1 March 2002 10:19:44 UTC