- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 29 Mar 2002 11:50:17 -0600
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
On Wed, 2002-03-13 at 07:04, Jeremy Carroll wrote: [...] > Yes your right. I am convinced. I will switch error1 to positive. Good; this is the conclusion Larry and I came to[Cannes] on the basis of: "5.2. Resolving Relative References to Absolute Form [...] Note that only the scheme component is required to be present in the base URI; the other components may be empty or undefined." -- http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt [Cannes] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20020225-f2f/irclog-2002-02-26.html#T09-02-40 > > > > We seem to be sort-of generating test cases for other specifications > > (RFC 2396, xml base) which we generally shouldn't be doing :) > > > > > Hmmm... > > that's food for thought. > > Jeremy -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Friday, 29 March 2002 12:51:15 UTC