- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 19:01:30 -0500 (EST)
- To: Frank Manola <fmanola@mitre.org>
- cc: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On Wed, 20 Mar 2002, Frank Manola wrote: > Well *I* certainly viewed it as jokey, especially given the context (if (me too, fwiw) > you'll pardon the expression). But I certainly second Brian's comment > about the respect in which we hold each other. Yes, I have to say I've really enjoyed being involved in the RDF effort for this reason. There's (for the most part) a civility that's often missing in online technical discussions. Like Brian, I tend to jump on swearing on the RDF IG lists. It may matter less on small WG lists than on larger lists open to public subscribers, but I think it's worth erring on the prudish side, for reasons nicely articulated by Rick Jelliffe in [1]. My previous outburst on this subject is at [2], [[ Could you please try to avoid swearing on RDF Interest Group mailing lists? While it may sound petty, keeping some control over the tone of our language helps to create a less threatening, hostile environment. For those of us know each other or have met offline, out-of-band context may implicitly lighten the tone, but for those new to this community, swearing can create a sour and unfriendly atmosphere. So I'd appreciate it if folk could stick to this simple guideline (ie: swearing: don't). I've no interest in getting into debate about whether "dash it", "darn" etc count as swearing. The real point is about (real or perceived) tone and attitude rather than vocabulary. Perhaps we should have followed Rick Jelliffe's Schematron model and called this the www-rdf-calendar-lovein list? See [1] for Rick's critique of the XML-DEV mailing list culture and on the need to foster non-confrontational debating styles if we are to be truly pluralist and international in our work. Swearing on a mailing list is very different from doing so in real life, where you've a better sense of audience and audience reaction. ]] Dan [1] http://rdfweb.org/people/danbri/2001/05/hk/batch10/ani.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-calendar/2001May/0036.html
Received on Wednesday, 20 March 2002 19:02:34 UTC