- From: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 10:24:48 -0600
- To: Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>, Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- CC: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Modifying Graham's version:
> In standard usage for web document retrieval, the representation accessed by
> a URL with a fragment identifier is related to the representation accessed
> by the URL alone, in a way that depends on the MIME type of the document
> representation retrieved. However, in RDF, the thing identified by a URI
> with fragment identifier does not bear any particular relationship to the
> thing identified by the URI alone.
Add:
This contradicts some readings of the URI specification[RFC2396], so caution
is recommended when creating new RDF terms which use fragment identifiers.
And I'll be happy with this wording.
--
"Aaron Swartz" | Semplesh
<mailto:me@aaronsw.com> | <http://semplesh.com/>
<http://www.aaronsw.com/> | soak up the information
Received on Tuesday, 12 March 2002 11:24:51 UTC