- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 13:59:36 -0000
- To: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "RDF Core" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
> > I propose that: > > - The Unicode strings within RDF literals are required to be in NFC. > - We note that literals whose unicode strings start with a combining > character may not be serializable in an XML document that conforms with > forthcoming Character Model Recommendations. > - We include a test case of such a literal as legal, to be reviewed if > Charmod reaches rec before we do. > > And that in the definition of the RDF graph we use MUST language, whereas in the discussion of RDF/XML we indicate that parsers SHOULD use normalizing transcoders, (with a reference to a CHARMOD WD). Issue: do we want a note saying that non normalized unicode input MUST NOT be normalized. (This is one of the safe guards in charmod, but it assumes that specs are defining a processing model, and we are not).
Received on Thursday, 14 March 2002 09:00:09 UTC