- From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 12:24:57 +0000
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
- CC: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
>>>Jeremy Carroll said: > Syntactic comments only .... <snip/> I'm not making any syntactic comments - I can invent an N-Triples change and/or some RDF/XML to implement both of these ideas fairly easily (if challenged). I'd rather we concentrated on the model aspects of this. My concerns are: * Is adding dark triples a good idea? I'd like use cases to support this. Foundation and semweb layering is a start; informal indications that WebOnt need this is another. * Is adding 'contexts'/whatever a good idea? Use cases would help here too; the widespread use of N3 {} (TimBL calls formulas) is an indicator. * Would these be required to implement RDF or optional? I suspect they'd have to be optional, in the way RDF Schema is optional. * Is it a good idea to make these changes at this time in the WG process? Don't know; if this starts taking too long, too much energy, we should consider punting. (Although if we don't do it now, it won't be till a successor WG) Dave
Received on Wednesday, 20 March 2002 07:24:58 UTC