- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 15:06:53 -0500 (EST)
- To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- cc: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, Massimo Marchiori <massimo@w3.org>, Lynn Andrea Stein <las@olin.edu>
On Sun, 24 Mar 2002, Dave Beckett wrote: > >>>Dan Connolly said: > > Pat, Dave, > > <snip /> > > > Dave, I wonder if the syntax spec should > > say something about "in the past, RDF > > parsers have parsed anonymous nodes > > by generating arbitrary URIs; don't do that; > > make sure the parser client can tell the > > URI references from the anonymous nodes". > > Good idea; I'll that near in section on identifiers, since I'm > going to expand that to bullets anyway. Coming soon somewhere in: > > http://ilrt.org/discovery/2001/07/rdf-syntax-grammar/#section-Identifiers This was pretty much the same worry as the one I raised this morning about the serialization text (though going in the opposite direction): http://ilrt.org/discovery/2001/07/rdf-syntax-grammar/#section-Serialising [[ The basic approach uses the basic RDF syntax from [RDF-MS]. * All blank nodes are assigned arbitrary URIs. ... ]] BTW I wrote a reply to your msg earlier but crashed my ssh session and lost it. Short version: none of my comments are urgent enough to delay publication. Consider them early feedback on the next WD. In particular, I withdraw my comment re rdf:Description (though I'll continue to not use it myself). Dan
Received on Sunday, 24 March 2002 15:06:57 UTC