- From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 12:48:35 +0000
- To: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 12:29 PM 3/25/02 +0000, Jan Grant wrote: >This is, surprise, going down a rathole fast, so this is my last pulic >post on the topic... OK. >A better bet (I think) is to just do something Herbrandish - that is, >keep the current definition of "interpretation"; if you _do_ wind up >with one of Dan's problematical graphs (that is, one with a URI-labelled >node with no "meaning", ie, which doesn't denote anything*), you don't >really hurt yourself by letting it denote some mathematical figment that >doesn't collide with anything else. That sounds very like what I was trying to say. #g ------------------- Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Monday, 25 March 2002 07:43:09 UTC