- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 17:51:58 +0000
- To: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>
- Cc: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 11:31 26/03/2002 -0600, Aaron Swartz wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>Since I haven't gotten any comments the past few days, I was wondering if it
>was alright to submit my most recent draft-draft of the media type
>registration. It'll be published as an IETF Internet-Draft, essentailly an
>IETF work-in-progress working draft.
Aaron, thanks for pushing this forward.
>Brian, since I'd like to label it as coming from the WG, what process should
>I go thru. Do we have to sign off on it at a telecon or can I just send it
>in?
>
>The text copy of the draft is below. The latest copy is always available at:
> http://www.aaronsw.com/2002/rdf-mediatype.{txt,html,ms,xml}
The security considerations section looks a bit risky and imprecise; a flag
red enough to attract attention, but having no answers.
[[The rdf:ID and rdf:about attributes can be used to define fragments in an
RDF document.]]
Is that true? Hmmm, we said rdf:ID="foo" was equivalent to
rdf:about="#foo". Does rdf:ID actually define a fragment in the
document? Did we mean that to happen with rdf:about too?
I'd like to see two things:
o an overview of the ietf process, preferably from someone who has done
this before. Are we cooked to start this?
o Your current draft copied to an archive and review by at least two
members of the WG. If we can get volunteers asap, I can put it on the
agenda for approval this Friday.
Brian
Received on Tuesday, 26 March 2002 13:10:02 UTC