W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > March 2002

RE: 2002-02-25#19, Fragment identifiers, words for the primer

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 16:31:59 -0000
To: "Aaron Swartz" <me@aaronsw.com>, "Graham Klyne" <GK@NineByNine.org>
Cc: "RDF Core" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <JAEBJCLMIFLKLOJGMELDAEFFCDAA.jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
> Add:
> This contradicts some readings of the URI specification[RFC2396],
> so caution
> is recommended when creating new RDF terms which use fragment identifiers.

No, ....

That goes too far. rdf:ID makes new RDF terms of this sort. We cannot
caution against use of rdf:ID without butchering the language.-

You cannot use reification syntax without this. Maybe we should be warning
against reification :), but not in this way.

Received on Tuesday, 12 March 2002 11:32:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:10 UTC