W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > March 2002

Re: schedule to last call?

From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 09:20:06 +0200
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <B8BF5646.1135F%patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
On 2002-03-20 14:25, "ext Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com> wrote:

> I am concerned that we are not leaving the possibility for the community to
> review the datatyping proposal.
> In this schedule the first MT with datatyping *is* the last call.
> The gap for commuity feedback on schema (with or without datatyping) before
> the last call WD is available is (less than) a week.

Would it be reasonable to alert the most relevant groups to the planned
schedule, and point them to the WD's along the way, so they realize that
they will not have a long leisurely time to review the last call spec?

> As is, as far as I know, we don't have a finished datatyping proposal to
> write up into the WDs.

It will reflect the present state of concensus -- and though not finished,
it seems pretty close to complete, even with the remaining issues.

> On the other hand, last call is not a rec, and we should get community
> feedback at that point ...

Quite so. And even if folks do not choose to review the WD's along
the way to last call, they can be made aware of the short review period
after last call well in advance of that time, so they should be
"primed" for review.



Patrick Stickler              Phone: +358 50 483 9453
Senior Research Scientist     Fax:   +358 7180 35409
Nokia Research Center         Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Thursday, 21 March 2002 02:17:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:24:11 UTC