- From: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 13:18:54 -0600
- To: Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
- CC: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On 2002-03-12 1:11 PM, "Graham Klyne" <GK@NineByNine.org> wrote: >> This contradicts some readings of the URI specification[RFC2396], so caution >> is recommended when creating new RDF terms which use fragment identifiers. > > I think that's too strong, on two counts "contradicts" and > "caution". It may be strong but I believe it's true (I'm interested in evidence to the contrary). Your on the other hand is false, or is at least misleading. (Specifically your claim that RFC2396 focuses on document retrieval. It is very clear about describing URIs in the abstract sense.) -- [ "Aaron Swartz" ; <mailto:me@aaronsw.com> ; <http://www.aaronsw.com/> ]
Received on Tuesday, 12 March 2002 14:18:58 UTC