- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 12:18:18 -0000
- To: "Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, "Pat Hayes" <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, "RDF Core" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: Brian McBride [mailto:bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com] > Sent: 20 March 2002 15:29 > To: Jeremy Carroll; Patrick Stickler; Pat Hayes; RDF Core > Subject: RE: Unasserted triples, Contexts and things that go bump in the > night. > > > At 11:32 20/03/2002 +0000, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > [...] > > >A fair point ... my example is bad stylistically, but does show > that the XML > >syntax is as flexible as the n-triple syntax. > > This is encoding information in the namespace prefix. Is that > legal, e.g. > will cannonicalization preserve the distinction? Will this be another > "thats those rdf weirdo's bending/breaking the rules again." > Hmmm, I think it's legal. Jeremy
Received on Thursday, 21 March 2002 07:19:12 UTC