- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 10:06:09 +0200
- To: ext Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@mimesweeper.com>
- CC: ext Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On 2002-03-12 20:48, "ext Graham Klyne" <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com> wrote: > At 01:03 PM 3/12/02 +0200, Patrick Stickler wrote: >> works OK, since the bNode is a member of the value >> space of xsd:integer; but >> >> Bob age "35" . >> >> generates a range constraint conflict since "35" is >> a member of the lexical space, not value space of >> xsd:integer. > > This is addressed/allowed by the latest datatyping proposal [1], in the form: > > ex:Jenny ex:age "10" . > ex:age rdfs:drange datatype:decimal . You missed my point, Graham. I was concerned with generic application of rdfs:range constraints by RDFS Validators having no special knowledge of datatypes. Obviously, I'm quite aware of the functionality of rdfs:drange. Patrick > #g > -- > > [1] http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/users/phayes/simpledatatype23-02-2002.html > > > ------------------- > Graham Klyne > <GK@NineByNine.org> > > -- Patrick Stickler Phone: +358 50 483 9453 Senior Research Scientist Fax: +358 7180 35409 Nokia Research Center Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Wednesday, 13 March 2002 03:04:08 UTC