- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 10:06:09 +0200
- To: ext Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@mimesweeper.com>
- CC: ext Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On 2002-03-12 20:48, "ext Graham Klyne" <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
wrote:
> At 01:03 PM 3/12/02 +0200, Patrick Stickler wrote:
>> works OK, since the bNode is a member of the value
>> space of xsd:integer; but
>>
>> Bob age "35" .
>>
>> generates a range constraint conflict since "35" is
>> a member of the lexical space, not value space of
>> xsd:integer.
>
> This is addressed/allowed by the latest datatyping proposal [1], in the form:
>
> ex:Jenny ex:age "10" .
> ex:age rdfs:drange datatype:decimal .
You missed my point, Graham. I was concerned with generic application
of rdfs:range constraints by RDFS Validators having no special knowledge
of datatypes.
Obviously, I'm quite aware of the functionality of rdfs:drange.
Patrick
> #g
> --
>
> [1] http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/users/phayes/simpledatatype23-02-2002.html
>
>
> -------------------
> Graham Klyne
> <GK@NineByNine.org>
>
>
--
Patrick Stickler Phone: +358 50 483 9453
Senior Research Scientist Fax: +358 7180 35409
Nokia Research Center Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Wednesday, 13 March 2002 03:04:08 UTC