- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 12:47:21 +0200
- To: ext Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On 2002-03-11 20:37, "ext Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> wrote: > At 21:00 08/03/2002 +0200, Patrick Stickler wrote > > [...] > >> Right? If that has changed, please tell me when, where and why. >> >> That's not to say that literals are not things in the universe, >> only that literals are not members of the RDF class rdfs:Resource. >> >> -- >> >> If that hasn't changed, then... > > http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-literalsubjects > > Resolution: On the 15th February 2002, at the RDFCore WG telecon, the WG: > > * resolved that the current syntaxes (RDF/XML, n-triples, graph > syntax) do not allow literals as subjects. > * noted that it is aware of no reason why literals should not be > subjects and a future WG with a less restrictive charter may extend the > syntaxes to allow literals as the subjects of statements. I didn't read that resolution as explicitly saying that literals are members of the RDF class rdfs:Resource. Patrick -- Patrick Stickler Phone: +358 50 483 9453 Senior Research Scientist Fax: +358 7180 35409 Nokia Research Center Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Tuesday, 12 March 2002 05:45:24 UTC