- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 09:04:53 +0200
- To: ext Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On 2002-03-12 16:44, "ext Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> wrote:
> At 15:58 12/03/2002 +0200, Patrick Stickler wrote:
>> On 2002-03-12 15:01, "ext Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>
>> The point I am trying to make here is that with the
>> present treatment of datatype URI's denoting only the
>> value space rather than the entire datatype,
>
> In the present model theory, datatype URI's denote the
> datatype.
>
> The class extension of the datatype is the value
> space.
Hmmm...
So, when used with rdfs:drange, the URI denotes the complete
datatype but when used with rdfs:range and rdfs:domain,
the URI denotes only the value space of the datatype?
So, the URI denotes different things in different contexts?
I consider that to be a bug.
Patrick
--
Patrick Stickler Phone: +358 50 483 9453
Senior Research Scientist Fax: +358 7180 35409
Nokia Research Center Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Wednesday, 13 March 2002 02:40:01 UTC