- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 13:59:59 +0200
- To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- CC: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On 2002-03-17 2:53, "ext Pat Hayes" <phayes@ai.uwf.edu> wrote: >> A very much lesser possible issue: is the name "rdfs:drange" >> appropriate for its use to indicate allowable lexical forms? > > Well, I suggested that we change it to rdfs:dcrange in order partly > to make it even less similar to rdfs:range. The 'range' part does > make some sense, since it applies to the object of the property > rather than the subject, but I agree it is potentially confusing. I propose we call it rdfs:datatype and its purpose is to associate a datatype with a property for extra-RDF datatype validation. Thus, there is no confusion with any rdfs:range like functionality "below the line". I also like rdfs:lex better, too ;-) Patrick -- Patrick Stickler Phone: +358 50 483 9453 Senior Research Scientist Fax: +358 7180 35409 Nokia Research Center Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Tuesday, 19 March 2002 06:58:16 UTC