Adrian Paschke
Adrian Walker
Alan Ruttenberg
Alexander De Leon
Alexander Garcia Castro
Amélie Marian
Andrea Splendiani
Andy Seaborne
Ansaf Salleb-Aouissi
Ansgar Scherp
Antoine Isaac
Antoine Zimmermann
Antonia Albani
Atilla Elci \(EMU\)
Axel Ngonga
Axel Polleres
Axel Rauschmayer
AzamatAbdoullaev
Barry Bishop
Barry Norton
Bjoern Hoehrmann
Bob DuCharme
Bob Ferris
Brian McBride
Cecil New
Chengcui Zhang
Chris Dollin
Christoph LANGE
Christophe Debruyne
Christopher Gutteridge
Dan Brickley
Daniel Schwabe
Dave Beckett
Dave Reynolds
David Booth
- Re: Why skolemization? (Tuesday, 29 March)
- Re: Indicating Skolem Nodes (was Re: AW: {Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again)) (Tuesday, 29 March)
- Re: Why skolemization? (Saturday, 26 March)
- The resource identity guessing game vs. bounded ambiguity [was Re: Comments on "SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs"] (Saturday, 26 March)
- Re: Indicating Skolem Nodes (was Re: AW: {Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again)) (Saturday, 26 March)
- Re: Indicating Skolem Nodes (was Re: AW: {Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again)) (Saturday, 26 March)
- Re: AW: {Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again) (Thursday, 24 March)
- Re: Blank nodes, "leaning", and the LEM (Wednesday, 23 March)
- Re: Ambiguity (Monday, 21 March)
- Re: Comments on "SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs" (Monday, 21 March)
- Re: Ambiguity (was: Comments on "SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs") (Monday, 21 March)
- Re: Comments on "SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs" (Monday, 21 March)
- Re: Comments on "SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs" (Sunday, 20 March)
- Re: Comments on "SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs" (Friday, 18 March)
- Re: Comments on "SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs" (Friday, 18 March)
- Re: Comments on "SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs" (Friday, 18 March)
David Laniado
David Shotton
Denny Vrandecic
Dicheva, Darina
Dieter Fensel
- Re: {Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again) (Thursday, 24 March)
- Re: AW: {Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again) (Thursday, 24 March)
- Re: AW: {Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again) (Thursday, 24 March)
- Re: AW: {Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again) (Thursday, 24 March)
- Re: {Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again) (Wednesday, 23 March)
- Re: {Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again) (Sunday, 20 March)
- Re: {Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again) (Friday, 18 March)
- Re: data schema / vocabulary / ontology / repositories (Monday, 14 March)
- Re: data schema / vocabulary / ontology / repositories (Sunday, 13 March)
- Re: data schema / vocabulary / ontology / repositories (Sunday, 13 March)
- data schema / vocabulary / ontology / repositories (Sunday, 13 March)
- Re: the list of semantic technology companies now enriched with dog food (Tuesday, 1 March)
- Re: the list of semantic technology companies now enriched with dog food (Tuesday, 1 March)
- Re: the list of semantic technology companies now enriched with dog food (Tuesday, 1 March)
- Re: the list of semantic technology companies now enriched with dog food (Tuesday, 1 March)
- RE: the list of semantic technology companies now enriched with dog food (Tuesday, 1 March)
Dorothee Reinhard
Elisa Kendall
Enrico Franconi
- Re: {Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again) (Thursday, 24 March)
- Re: {Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again) (Thursday, 24 March)
- Re: Blank nodes, "leaning", and the LEM (Wednesday, 23 March)
- Re: Blank nodes, "leaning", and the LEM (Wednesday, 23 March)
- Re: Blank nodes, "leaning", and the LEM (Wednesday, 23 March)
- Re: {Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again) (Sunday, 20 March)
Enrico Motta
Erik Mannens
Fabian Abel
Fabien Gandon
Flavio De Paoli
Flavius Frasincar
Francisco Javier López Pellicer
G.Akmayeva
George A. Papadopoulos
Giancarlo Guizzardi
Giovanni Tummarello
Graham Klyne
Gregg Reynolds
- Re: Blank nodes, leaning, and the OWA (Tuesday, 29 March)
- Re: Blank nodes, leaning, and the OWA (Monday, 28 March)
- Re: Blank nodes, leaning, and the OWA (Monday, 28 March)
- Re: Blank nodes, leaning, and the OWA (Monday, 28 March)
- Re: Blank nodes, leaning, and the OWA (Monday, 28 March)
- Re: Blank nodes, leaning, and the OWA (Monday, 28 March)
- Blank nodes, leaning, and the OWA (Sunday, 27 March)
- Re: thisiness (Friday, 25 March)
- Re: thisiness (Friday, 25 March)
- thisiness (Friday, 25 March)
- Re: Blank nodes, "leaning", and the LEM (Thursday, 24 March)
- Re: Blank nodes, "leaning", and the LEM (Thursday, 24 March)
- Re: AW: {Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again) (Thursday, 24 March)
- Re: Blank nodes, "leaning", and the LEM (Wednesday, 23 March)
- Blank nodes, "leaning", and the LEM (Wednesday, 23 March)
- Re: Some heresies (was Re: Comments on "SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs") (Wednesday, 23 March)
- Some heresies (was Re: Comments on "SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs") (Tuesday, 22 March)
Gunnar Aastrand Grimnes
Harald Sack
Henry Story
Hogan, Aidan
HR
hra@cs.uga.edu
Hugh Glaser
Ian Davis
Iker Huerga
Irene Celino
Ivan Herman
Ivan Shmakov
- Re: Properties vs datatypes vs resources (Sunday, 27 March)
- Re: blank nodes (once again) (Tuesday, 22 March)
- Re: blank nodes (once again) (Tuesday, 15 March)
- blank nodes (once again) (Monday, 14 March)
- Re: implementations of networked RDF store replication, please? (Wednesday, 2 March)
- Re: a blank node issue (Wednesday, 2 March)
- Re: a blank node issue (Tuesday, 1 March)
- a blank node issue (Tuesday, 1 March)
- Re: canonical RDF graph representations (Tuesday, 1 March)
- canonical RDF graph representations (Tuesday, 1 March)
- Re: implementations of networked RDF store replication, please? (Tuesday, 1 March)
Iván Cantador
Jean-Marc Vanel
Jeen Broekstra
Jens Lehmann
Jesse Weaver
Jie Bao
Jiří Procházka
Jonathan Rees
Jose María Alvarez Rodríguez
Joshua Shinavier
João Manuel R. S. Tavares
Juan Sequeda
Jérôme Kunegis
Katharina Siorpaes
Keith Alexander
Kingsley Idehen
- Re: LOV - Linked Open Vocabularies (Thursday, 31 March)
- Re: LOV - Linked Open Vocabularies (Monday, 28 March)
- Re: LOV - Linked Open Vocabularies (Monday, 28 March)
- Re: LOV - Linked Open Vocabularies (Monday, 28 March)
- Update: Guides for using Microsoft PivotViewer with SPARQL endpoints (Friday, 25 March)
- Linked Data Visualization using Microsoft's PivotViewer atop SPARQL Endpoints (Thursday, 24 March)
- Re: data schema / vocabulary / ontology / repositories (Tuesday, 15 March)
- Re: data schema / vocabulary / ontology / repositories (Monday, 14 March)
- Re: data schema / vocabulary / ontology / repositories (Monday, 14 March)
- Re: data schema / vocabulary / ontology / repositories (Monday, 14 March)
- Re: data schema / vocabulary / ontology / repositories (Monday, 14 March)
- Re: data schema / vocabulary / ontology / repositories (Sunday, 13 March)
- Re: Linked Data Book: HTML Version Live at linkeddatabook.com (was: Re: ANN: New book about Linked Data published) (Wednesday, 2 March)
Kjetil Kjernsmo
Lejla Ibralic Halilovic
Luis Criado Fernández
Marin Dimitrov
Mario Pavone
Mark Wallace
Markus Krötzsch
Marlies Olensky
Martin Hepp
Melanie Courtot
Melvin Carvalho
Michael Brunnbauer
Michael F Uschold
Michael Hausenblas
Michael Schneider
Michel Dumontier
Milan Stankovic
N. Fanizzi
Nathan
- Re: Indicating Skolem Nodes (was Re: AW: {Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again)) (Wednesday, 30 March)
- Re: Blank nodes, leaning, and the OWA (Monday, 28 March)
- Re: Why skolemization? (Monday, 28 March)
- Re: Why skolemization? (Saturday, 26 March)
- Re: The resource identity guessing game vs. bounded ambiguity [was Re: Comments on "SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs"] (Saturday, 26 March)
- Re: Why skolemization? (Saturday, 26 March)
- Re: AW: {Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again) (Saturday, 26 March)
- Re: Why skolemization? (Saturday, 26 March)
- Why skolemization? (Saturday, 26 March)
- Re: thisiness (Friday, 25 March)
- Re: AW: {Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again) (Thursday, 24 March)
- Re: Blank nodes, "leaning", and the LEM (Wednesday, 23 March)
- Re: Comments on "SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs" (Wednesday, 23 March)
- Re: Ambiguity (Monday, 21 March)
- Re: Comments on "SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs" (Sunday, 20 March)
- Re: Comments on "SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs" (Sunday, 20 March)
- Re: Comments on "SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs" (Sunday, 20 March)
- Re: Comments on "SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs" (Friday, 18 March)
- Re: Comments on "SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs" (Friday, 18 March)
- Re: Criteria for a good JSON RDF serialisation (Thursday, 10 March)
- Re: Is there any repository of unsolved problems? (Monday, 7 March)
- Re: a blank node issue (Friday, 4 March)
- Re: a blank node issue (Wednesday, 2 March)
- Re: a blank node issue (Wednesday, 2 March)
- Re: a blank node issue (Wednesday, 2 March)
- Re: a blank node issue (Wednesday, 2 March)
- Re: ANN: http://www.productontology.org - more than 300,000 specific OWL DL classes for types of objects (Wednesday, 2 March)
- Re: a blank node issue (Tuesday, 1 March)
- Re: a blank node issue (Tuesday, 1 March)
- Re: ANN: http://www.productontology.org - more than 300,000 specific OWL DL classes for types of objects (Tuesday, 1 March)
- Re: The truth about SPARQL Endpoint availability (Tuesday, 1 March)
- Re: canonical RDF graph representations (Tuesday, 1 March)
Niklas Lindström
Obrst, Leo J.
Pablo Mendes
Paolucci, Massimo
Pat Hayes
- Re: Indicating Skolem Nodes (was Re: AW: {Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again)) (Tuesday, 29 March)
- Re: Blank nodes, leaning, and the OWA (Monday, 28 March)
- Re: Blank nodes, leaning, and the OWA (Monday, 28 March)
- Re: Blank nodes, leaning, and the OWA (Monday, 28 March)
- Re: Blank nodes, leaning, and the OWA (Monday, 28 March)
- Re: Blank nodes, leaning, and the OWA (Sunday, 27 March)
- Re: Indicating Skolem Nodes (was Re: AW: {Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again)) (Saturday, 26 March)
- Re: Indicating Skolem Nodes (was Re: AW: {Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again)) (Saturday, 26 March)
- Re: AW: {Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again) (Saturday, 26 March)
- Re: Why skolemization? (Saturday, 26 March)
- Re: thisiness (Saturday, 26 March)
- Re: Indicating Skolem Nodes (was Re: AW: {Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again)) (Saturday, 26 March)
- Re: Indicating Skolem Nodes (was Re: AW: {Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again)) (Saturday, 26 March)
- Re: Indicating Skolem Nodes (was Re: AW: {Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again)) (Saturday, 26 March)
- Re: AW: {Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again) (Friday, 25 March)
- Re: Indicating Skolem Nodes (was Re: AW: {Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again)) (Friday, 25 March)
- Re: AW: {Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again) (Friday, 25 March)
- Re: AW: {Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again) (Friday, 25 March)
- Re: thisiness (Friday, 25 March)
- Re: {Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again) (Friday, 25 March)
- Re: AW: {Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again) (Friday, 25 March)
- Re: {Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again) (Friday, 25 March)
- Re: AW: {Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again) (Thursday, 24 March)
- Re: Blank nodes, "leaning", and the LEM (Thursday, 24 March)
- Re: AW: {Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again) (Thursday, 24 March)
- Re: Blank nodes, "leaning", and the LEM (Thursday, 24 March)
- Re: AW: AW: {Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again) (Thursday, 24 March)
- Re: AW: {Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again) (Thursday, 24 March)
- Re: AW: {Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again) (Thursday, 24 March)
- Re: Blank nodes, "leaning", and the LEM (Wednesday, 23 March)
- Re: Blank nodes, "leaning", and the LEM (Wednesday, 23 March)
- Re: Blank nodes, "leaning", and the LEM (Wednesday, 23 March)
- Re: Blank nodes, "leaning", and the LEM (Wednesday, 23 March)
- Re: Ambiguity (was: Comments on "SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs") (Monday, 21 March)
- Re: {Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again) (Monday, 21 March)
- Re: Comments on "SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs" (Monday, 21 March)
- Re: Comments on "SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs" (Sunday, 20 March)
- Re: {Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again) (Friday, 18 March)
- Re: {Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again) (Friday, 18 March)
- Re: blank nodes (once again) (Thursday, 17 March)
- Re: blank nodes (once again) (Wednesday, 16 March)
- Re: a blank node issue (Wednesday, 2 March)
- Re: a blank node issue (Wednesday, 2 March)
- Re: a blank node issue (Wednesday, 2 March)
- Re: a blank node issue (Tuesday, 1 March)
- Re: a blank node issue (Tuesday, 1 March)
Paul Gearon
Paul Groth
Paul Tyson
Paulheim, Heiko
Peter DeVries
Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider
Peter Krantz
Peter Williams
Pierre-Yves Vandenbussche
Rajendra Akerkar
Renaud Delbru
Reto Bachmann-Gmuer
Reto Bachmann-Gmür
Richard Cyganiak
- Re: Why skolemization? (Wednesday, 30 March)
- Re: Why skolemization? (Wednesday, 30 March)
- Re: Why skolemization? (Wednesday, 30 March)
- Re: Should we split this mailing list into semantic-web-announce and semantic-web-discuss? (Tuesday, 22 March)
- Re: data schema / vocabulary / ontology / repositories (Monday, 14 March)
- Re: data schema / vocabulary / ontology / repositories (Monday, 14 March)
- Re: tools for inspecting rdf (Tuesday, 8 March)
- Re: Is there any repository of unsolved problems? (Monday, 7 March)
- Re: The truth about SPARQL Endpoint availability (Sunday, 6 March)
- Re: a blank node issue (Thursday, 3 March)
- Re: a blank node issue (Wednesday, 2 March)
- Re: a blank node issue (Wednesday, 2 March)
- Re: a blank node issue (Wednesday, 2 March)
- Re: the list of semantic technology companies now enriched with dog food (Tuesday, 1 March)
- Re: The truth about SPARQL Endpoint availability (Tuesday, 1 March)
- Re: The truth about SPARQL Endpoint availability (Tuesday, 1 March)
Rob Vesse
Robert Jäschke
Sandro Hawke
- Re: Why skolemization? (Wednesday, 30 March)
- Re: Why skolemization? (Wednesday, 30 March)
- Re: Why skolemization? (Sunday, 27 March)
- Re: Indicating Skolem Nodes (was Re: AW: {Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again)) (Sunday, 27 March)
- Re: Why skolemization? (Sunday, 27 March)
- Re: Why skolemization? (Sunday, 27 March)
- Re: Indicating Skolem Nodes (was Re: AW: {Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again)) (Saturday, 26 March)
- Re: Indicating Skolem Nodes (was Re: AW: {Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again)) (Saturday, 26 March)
- Re: Indicating Skolem Nodes (was Re: AW: {Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again)) (Saturday, 26 March)
- Re: Indicating Skolem Nodes (was Re: AW: {Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again)) (Saturday, 26 March)
- Re: Indicating Skolem Nodes (was Re: AW: {Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again)) (Friday, 25 March)
- Indicating Skolem Nodes (was Re: AW: {Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again)) (Friday, 25 March)
- Re: AW: {Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again) (Friday, 25 March)
- Re: AW: {Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again) (Friday, 25 March)
- Re: AW: AW: {Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again) (Thursday, 24 March)
- Re: AW: {Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again) (Thursday, 24 March)
- graph terminology (was Re: Comments on "SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs") (Friday, 18 March)
- Re: a blank node issue (Wednesday, 2 March)
- Re: the list of semantic technology companies now enriched with dog food (Tuesday, 1 March)
Sean B. Palmer
Sebastian Rudolph
Sebastian Tramp
secretariat@isast.org
Shepherd, Michael
Silvio Peroni
Stefan Dietze
Steve Harris
- Re: Why skolemization? (Wednesday, 30 March)
- Re: Indicating Skolem Nodes (was Re: AW: {Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again)) (Wednesday, 30 March)
- Re: Why skolemization? (Sunday, 27 March)
- Re: Why skolemization? (Sunday, 27 March)
- Re: Why skolemization? (Sunday, 27 March)
- Re: Why skolemization? (Saturday, 26 March)
- Re: Why skolemization? (Saturday, 26 March)
- Re: Indicating Skolem Nodes (was Re: AW: {Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again)) (Saturday, 26 March)
- Re: Why skolemization? (Saturday, 26 March)
- Re: Why skolemization? (Saturday, 26 March)
- Re: Indicating Skolem Nodes (was Re: AW: {Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again)) (Saturday, 26 March)
- Re: Indicating Skolem Nodes (was Re: AW: {Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again)) (Saturday, 26 March)
- Re: Indicating Skolem Nodes (was Re: AW: {Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again)) (Saturday, 26 March)
- Re: Indicating Skolem Nodes (was Re: AW: {Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again)) (Saturday, 26 March)
- Re: Indicating Skolem Nodes (was Re: AW: {Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again)) (Saturday, 26 March)
- Re: Indicating Skolem Nodes (was Re: AW: {Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again)) (Friday, 25 March)
- Re: AW: {Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again) (Friday, 25 March)
- Re: a blank node issue (Wednesday, 2 March)
- Re: implementations of networked RDF store replication, please? (Wednesday, 2 March)
Thierry MICHEL
Tim Berners-Lee
tim.glover@bt.com
Toby Inkster
Todd J Schneider
Tom Heath
Tran Thanh
William Phipps
William Waites
Wolfram Wöß
Yury Katkov
Last message date: Thursday, 31 March 2011 20:37:26 UTC