- From: Jiří Procházka <ojirio@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 20:17:16 +0100
- To: Reto Bachmann-Gmür <reto.bachmann@trialox.org>
- CC: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>, William Waites <ww@styx.org>, nathan@webr3.org, Ivan Shmakov <oneingray@gmail.com>, semantic-web@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4D6E97BC.5050209@gmail.com>
On 03/02/2011 07:50 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür wrote: > ----- Original message ----- >> On 03/02/2011 07:21 PM, Pat Hayes wrote: >>> >>> On Mar 2, 2011, at 9:54 AM, Richard Cyganiak wrote: >>> >>>> On 2 Mar 2011, at 14:18, William Waites wrote: >>>>> maybe some convention or >>>>> standard for skolemising blank nodes so they can be >>>>> referred to might be a good thing? >>>> >>>> There is already a convention/standard for skolemising blank nodes: >>>> just use a URI instead. >>> >>> But that subtly changes the RDF, because the URI has global scope. >> >> Is there any practical difference between bnodes and normal nodes, >> except the scope (and necessity) of their name? > > Yes, a graph with bnodes can potentially be simplified: the same meaning may be expressed with a more lean graph, i.e. with less nodes and triples. If all your nodes are uris you cannot do simplifications with rdf entaillment. So that in fact means that bnodes are considered from a closed world scenario, where we assume there are no other references to the node outside of what we know. On the other hand normal nodes have global identifier which forces us to consider it from an open world scenario. To the scoping of the blank nodes: doesn't anyone else think there should be several types of blank nodes? (example: current graph, current document, maybe even specific document) Best, Jiri > Cheers, > Reto > >> >> Best, >> Jiri >> >>> Pat >>> >>>> >>>> Richard >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> -w >>>>> -- >>>>> William Waites <mailto:ww@styx.org> >>>>> http://river.styx.org/ww/ <sip:ww@styx.org> >>>>> F4B3 39BF E775 CF42 0BAB 3DF0 BE40 A6DF B06F FD45 >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------ >>> IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 >>> 3973 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office >>> Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax >>> FL 32502 (850)291 0667 mobile >>> phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> > >
Received on Wednesday, 2 March 2011 19:20:22 UTC