- From: Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 08:37:07 -0500
- To: <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- CC: <oneingray@gmail.com>, <ivan@main.uusia.org>, <semantic-web@w3.org>
This thrust for a canonical serialization puzzles me. What problem would a canonical serialization solve? Peter F. Patel-Schneider Bell Labs Research From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> Subject: Re: canonical RDF graph representations Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 07:13:08 -0600 > On 1 March 2011 10:50, Ivan Shmakov <ivan@main.uusia.org> wrote: >> The “The case for generating URIs by hashing RDF content” paper >> [1], dating back to 2002, mentions that “there is no current >> canonical serialization standard for RDF”. (Then, they suggest >> their own canonical representation.) >> >> I wonder, has such a standard been since proposed? >> >> [1] http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2002/HPL-2002-216.pdf > > Yes, it's important to have a standard way canonicalize RDF, or, at > least, RDF/XML imho. It's required for xmlsig, I think. > > I think there was an issue with bnodes ... maybe it's something we can solve. > > Maybe we can get this quickly to rec status? > >> >> -- >> FSF associate member #7257 >> >
Received on Tuesday, 1 March 2011 13:38:23 UTC