- From: William Waites <ww@styx.org>
- Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 17:21:48 +0100
- To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Cc: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, nathan@webr3.org, Ivan Shmakov <oneingray@gmail.com>, semantic-web@w3.org
* [2011-03-02 15:54:15 +0000] Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de> écrit: ] On 2 Mar 2011, at 14:18, William Waites wrote: ] > maybe some convention or ] > standard for skolemising blank nodes so they can be ] > referred to might be a good thing? ] ] There is already a convention/standard for skolemising blank ] nodes: just use a URI instead. And if I am not the author of the statements but I want to consume and manipulate them? Surely you aren't suggesting getting rid of bnodes completely? The vendor extensions that I was talking about do exactly this. The problem is they do it in different ways. -w -- William Waites <mailto:ww@styx.org> http://river.styx.org/ww/ <sip:ww@styx.org> F4B3 39BF E775 CF42 0BAB 3DF0 BE40 A6DF B06F FD45
Received on Wednesday, 2 March 2011 16:22:18 UTC