- From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 21:40:21 -0500
- To: Michael Brunnbauer <brunni@netestate.de>
- Cc: Dieter Fensel <dieter.fensel@sti2.at>, semantic-web@w3.org
On Mar 24, 2011, at 6:22 PM, Michael Brunnbauer wrote: > > re > > if I understand this right, skolemization can only be done on the RDF > producing side - not the consuming side (I did not read the 1000 emails). > Doing it on the consuming side must be prone to changes in the RDF document. It can be done anywhere, though yes, it does subtly change the meaning. > > So what is with all the RDF documents currently using bodes ? > > What if people start to adapt these documents ? > > Suppose a social network switches from bnodes to skolemized bnodes instead of > real URIs in their FOAF documents. People will get as many different URIs as > friends (every friend has a FOAF profile which states a foaf:knows with a > skolemized nbode for this person). This does not look like a good thing to me. Nor to me, but it does not make sense as stated. What is a "bnode for [a] person"? Bnodes by their very nature do not identify anything. Can you give some actual example RDF which you feel will be mistreated if its bnodes are skolemized? Pat > > Regards, > > Michael Brunnbauer > > -- > ++ Michael Brunnbauer > ++ netEstate GmbH > ++ Geisenhausener Straße 11a > ++ 81379 München > ++ Tel +49 89 32 19 77 80 > ++ Fax +49 89 32 19 77 89 > ++ E-Mail brunni@netestate.de > ++ http://www.netestate.de/ > ++ > ++ Sitz: München, HRB Nr.142452 (Handelsregister B München) > ++ USt-IdNr. DE221033342 > ++ Geschäftsführer: Michael Brunnbauer, Franz Brunnbauer > ++ Prokurist: Dipl. Kfm. (Univ.) Markus Hendel > > ------------------------------------------------------------ IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32502 (850)291 0667 mobile phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Friday, 25 March 2011 02:41:15 UTC