- From: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
- Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 10:05:46 -0400
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>, semantic-web@w3.org
[Branching from thread "Indicating Skolem Nodes (was Re: AW:
{Disarmed} Re: blank nodes (once again))"]
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 11:04 PM, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote:
> I keep meaning to define a way
> to avoid the extra round-trips by having hosts publish their redirect
> rules. Given that, they wouldn't be too bad....
Me too - I said pretty much the same thing last summer:
http://www.w3.org/QA/2010/07/new_opportunities_for_linked_d.html
I'd be happy to talk about how to bring about consensus on the method
for publishing these rules. The obvious method is using the
link-template feature of /.well-known/host-meta/. The author of the
host-meta internet-draft tells me he's going to work to advance it to
RFC, so that would save us the trouble of registering our own
.well-known entry. Then we'd just have to choose a link relation to
use for the purpose, and we're done.
Jonathan
Received on Saturday, 26 March 2011 14:06:19 UTC