- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 16:02:29 -0400
- To: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Cc: semantic-web@w3.org
On Sun, 2011-03-27 at 18:15 +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
>
> > Well, yeah, I figured the system doing the generation could freely
> do
> > either:
> > http://example.org/=rdfgensym=/668a93dc-e478-4c47-af45-f062b449cd21
> >
> > or
> > tag:example.org,2011:=rdfgensym=/668a93dc-e478-4c47-af45-f062b449cd21
> >
> > ... based on whether it wants to support deference or not.
I accidentally left out the other http example, to avoid a 303 when the
thing is not an information resource:
http://example.org/=rdfgensym=#668a93dc-e478-4c47-af45-f062b449cd21
That makes it harder to give good error information, though.
> That would be fine, I thought you were advocating always using HTTP
> URIs.
>
> Magic URI substrings still don't quite sit well with me though.
I understand. To me, they are a bit like 303s; not a solution I'm
particularly proud of proposing, but ... it seems like it will work, and
I can't think of anything better.
-- Sandro
Received on Sunday, 27 March 2011 20:02:39 UTC