- From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 13:01:49 +0000
- To: Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com>
- CC: Ivan Shmakov <oneingray@gmail.com>, Ivan Shmakov <ivan@main.uusia.org>, semantic-web@w3.org
can these two handle the case of: _:b1 :x _:b2 . _:b2 :y _:b1 . + yes I agree, would be great to have a canonical representaion and comparison method. Cheers, Nathan Niklas Lindström wrote: > Hi Ivan, > > while this isn't based on this or any newer standard proposal, the > Python-based RDFLib contains an implementation for canonicalizing and > comparing graphs. See the the "rdflib.compare" module: > > http://code.google.com/p/rdflib/source/browse/trunk/rdflib/compare.py > > It would be interesting to standardize something like that; and > certainly useful for some things. > > Best regards, > Niklas > > > > On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Ivan Shmakov <ivan@main.uusia.org> wrote: >> The “The case for generating URIs by hashing RDF content” paper >> [1], dating back to 2002, mentions that “there is no current >> canonical serialization standard for RDF”. (Then, they suggest >> their own canonical representation.) >> >> I wonder, has such a standard been since proposed? >> >> [1] http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2002/HPL-2002-216.pdf >> >> -- >> FSF associate member #7257 >> > > >
Received on Tuesday, 1 March 2011 13:03:42 UTC