[PORT] SKOS maintenance policy - 2/2 (substantive comments)
[PORT] SKOS maintenance policy - 1/2 ("minor errata")
RDFTM: Sort keys in RDF
Typo in Approach 4?
Comments on "Survey of RDF/Topic Maps"
[SE] Reviewers Needed
[SE,ALL] Invited Expert Needed
[SE] Outcome to Telecon 29 March 2005
[SE] Agenda of the SETF telecon today
SWBPD WG Resolution Regarding httpRange-14
- Re: SWBPD WG Resolution Regarding httpRange-14
- Re: SWBPD WG Resolution Regarding httpRange-14
- RE: SWBPD WG Resolution Regarding httpRange-14
- Re: SWBPD WG Resolution Regarding httpRange-14
- RE: SWBPD WG Resolution Regarding httpRange-14
[all] Volunteer Needed for Tutorial Page
[ALL] editors draft of simple part-whole note ready for review
- RE: [ALL] editors draft of simple part-whole note ready for review
- Re: [ALL] editors draft of simple part-whole note ready for review
FAQ Editor
[SE] ODA draft available from the SE homepage
[PORT] moving SKOS Core fwd
RE: [ALL] agenda 24 March telecon - PORT Actions
RE : regrets for thursday telecon
RDFTM Disposition of Comments
[ALL] agenda 24 March telecon
[ALL] proposal to publish XSCH WD
regrets for Thursday 3/24
regrets for thursday telecon
Putting server added information to the result?
telecon regrets for thurs march 24
[action completion] W3C URI Persistence Policy
Regrets for Thursday's telcon
[PORT] SKOS Core spec and guide (was RE: A problem RE: Dereferencing SKOS Core)
meeting record: 2005-03-03 Boston F2F
- Re: meeting record: 2005-03-03 Boston F2F
- Re: meeting record: 2005-03-03 Boston F2F
- Re: meeting record: 2005-03-03 Boston F2F
- Re: meeting record: 2005-03-03 Boston F2F
RDFTM comments: Uschold
RDFTM comments: Noy
RDFTM comments: Wood
RDFTM comments: Swick
RDFTM comments: DanC
comment on new draft of RDFTM Survey
RDFTM: New draft of Survey
[ALL] proposed resolution httpRange-14
- RE: [ALL] proposed resolution httpRange-14
- RE: [ALL] proposed resolution httpRange-14
- RE: [ALL] proposed resolution httpRange-14
- Re: [ALL] proposed resolution httpRange-14
- RE: [ALL] proposed resolution httpRange-14
- RE: [ALL] proposed resolution httpRange-14
- RE: [ALL] proposed resolution httpRange-14
[SE] Outcome to Telecon 16th March 2005
[SE] FYI SOFTWARE ENGINEERING AND FORMAL METHODS
Re: [SE] Suggested agenda for next telecon (Tues 15th March 1pm EST)
RE: [SE] Suggested agenda for next telecon (Tues 15th March 1pm EST)
R:comment - RDFTM: Survey of Interoperability Proposals
Fw: [SE] Suggested agenda for next telecon (Tues 15th March 1pm EST)
[XSCH] new editors draft
FW: [Chat] UMBC Semantic Web Reference Card
[PORT] mapping
[OEP] new Editor's draft of classes as values available
- RE: [OEP] new Editor's draft of classes as values available
- [ALL] new Editor's draft of classes as values available
RE: [OEP] Classes as Values - Abstract
VM Task Force slides from f2f
RE: [OEP] naming CaV patterns [was: new Editor's draft of classes as valuesavailable]
- Re: [OEP] naming CaV patterns [was: new Editor's draft of classes as valuesavailable]
- RE: [OEP] naming CaV patterns [was: new Editor's draft of classes as valuesavailable]
[OEP] slightly reworked auto BillofMaterial for part-whole note
- re:[OEP] slightly reworked auto BillofMaterial for part-whole note
- RE: [OEP] slightly reworked auto BillofMaterial for part-whole note
What do HTTP URIs Identify?
[ALL] versioning
comment - RDFTM: Survey of Interoperability Proposals
- RE: comment - RDFTM: Survey of Interoperability Proposals
- RE: comment - RDFTM: Survey of Interoperability Proposals
- Re: comment - RDFTM: Survey of Interoperability Proposals
- RE: comment - RDFTM: Survey of Interoperability Proposals
- RE: comment - RDFTM: Survey of Interoperability Proposals
RE: [OEP] new Editor's draft of classes as values available - TITLE of NOTE
[rdftm, port, etc] another example: William and Chet
[ALL] March 10 telecon CANCELLED
Specified values
RE: SW / ontology in telecommunication field
[OEP] Action: Split out Note Conventions
[OEP, ALL] Naming Conventions for OWL code
[OEP] new Editor's draft of classes as values available
[OEP] list of terms from the classes as values note
Re: possible DRAFT msg to TAG
W3C Persistence Policy and SKOS Core Vocabulary spec
possible DRAFT msg to TAG
archived IRC log for the f2f
[Fwd: Re: Question scenario RDF in XHTML]
RDFTM slides as presented by Steve
Re: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/XSCH/xsch-sw-20050127/
Latest version of ODA note
[SETF] recommended members
[OEP] simple part-whole note new draft
Latest version of SE Draft
[RDFTM] comments on survey
[Fwd: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender]
[OEP] Classes as Values - A detailed review
- Re: [OEP] Classes as Values - A detailed review
- RE: [OEP] Classes as Values - A detailed review
- RE: [OEP] Classes as Values - A detailed review
- RE: [OEP] Classes as Values - A detailed review
- RE: [OEP] Classes as Values - A detailed review
- FW: [OEP] Classes as Values - A detailed review
- Re: [OEP] Classes as Values - A detailed review
- RE: [OEP] Classes as Values - A detailed review