- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 10:38:00 -0500
- To: Christopher Welty <welty@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: public-swbp-wg@w3.org, public-swbp-wg-request@w3.org
* Christopher Welty <welty@us.ibm.com> [2005-03-08 10:25-0500] > I think the issue of identification is both important and extremely > difficult. I suggest that this is big enough to be a task force in > itself. I can see a case for that, except we have a load of TFs already. Maybe it can be queued up for when some of the others terminate? There's a basic level of non-URI identification that's achievable just using OWL 'InverseFunctionalProperty'. We could do worse than push out a little note on that... (though in fact there are some issues around change over time un-addressed by the OWL semantics which can bite when using OWL IFP for identification, so even that seemingly modest task could blow up into something bigger... Dan
Received on Tuesday, 8 March 2005 15:38:00 UTC