public-swbp-wg@w3.org from March 2005 by date

Thursday, 31 March 2005

• RE: SWBPD WG Resolution Regarding httpRange-14 Govoni, Darren
• Re: SWBPD WG Resolution Regarding httpRange-14 Dan Connolly
• Re: Comments on "Survey of RDF/Topic Maps" Steven R. Newcomb
• Re: [PORT] SKOS maintenance policy - 2/2 (substantive comments) Thomas Baker

Wednesday, 30 March 2005

• [PORT] SKOS maintenance policy - 2/2 (substantive comments) Thomas Baker
• [PORT] SKOS maintenance policy - 1/2 ("minor errata") Thomas Baker
• RE: Comments on "Survey of RDF/Topic Maps" Bernard Vatant
• RDFTM: Sort keys in RDF Steve Pepper

Tuesday, 29 March 2005

• Typo in Approach 4? Mike Brand

Wednesday, 30 March 2005

• Re: SWBPD WG Resolution Regarding httpRange-14 Jonathan Borden
• Re: [ALL] editors draft of simple part-whole note ready for review Natasha Noy

Tuesday, 29 March 2005

• Comments on "Survey of RDF/Topic Maps" Steven R. Newcomb
• [SE] Reviewers Needed Jeff Pan
• [SE,ALL] Invited Expert Needed Jeff Pan
• [SE] Outcome to Telecon 29 March 2005 Jeff Pan
• Re: [SE] Agenda of the SETF telecon today ewallace@cme.nist.gov
• Re: [all] Volunteer Needed for Tutorial Page Benjamin Nguyen
• RE: [PORT] moving SKOS Core fwd Miles, AJ \(Alistair\)
• [SE] Agenda of the SETF telecon today Jeff Pan
• Re: SWBPD WG Resolution Regarding httpRange-14 Patrick Stickler

Monday, 28 March 2005

• RE: [ALL] editors draft of simple part-whole note ready for review Bill McDaniel
• Re: SWBPD WG Resolution Regarding httpRange-14 Jeremy Carroll
• RE: SWBPD WG Resolution Regarding httpRange-14 McBride, Brian
• Re: SWBPD WG Resolution Regarding httpRange-14 David Wood

Sunday, 27 March 2005

• Re: SWBPD WG Resolution Regarding httpRange-14 Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: SWBPD WG Resolution Regarding httpRange-14 David Wood
• Re: [all] Volunteer Needed for Tutorial Page Jeff Pan

Saturday, 26 March 2005

• SWBPD WG Resolution Regarding httpRange-14 David Wood

Friday, 25 March 2005

• Re: [all] Volunteer Needed for Tutorial Page Benjamin Nguyen

Thursday, 24 March 2005

• Re: [OEP] slightly reworked auto BillofMaterial for part-whole note Alan Rector
• RE: telecon regrets for thurs march 24 Uschold, Michael F
• Re: [all] Volunteer Needed for Tutorial Page Jeff Pan
• [all] Volunteer Needed for Tutorial Page David Wood
• RE: RDFTM Disposition of Comments (RDFTM-DC001) Steve Pepper
• [ALL] editors draft of simple part-whole note ready for review Christopher Welty
• FAQ Editor Benjamin Nguyen
• Re: telecon regrets for thurs march 24 Fabien Gandon
• Re: [ALL] proposal to publish XSCH WD Jeff Pan
• RE: [ALL] proposal to publish XSCH WD ewallace@cme.nist.gov
• Re: RDFTM Disposition of Comments David Wood
• RE: [ALL] proposed resolution httpRange-14 Miles, AJ \(Alistair\)
• [SE] ODA draft available from the SE homepage Jeff Pan
• [PORT] moving SKOS Core fwd Miles, AJ \(Alistair\)
• Re: telecon regrets for thurs march 24 Dan Brickley
• Re: telecon regrets for thurs march 24 Libby Miller
• RE: [ALL] proposed resolution httpRange-14 Ralph R. Swick
• RE: [ALL] agenda 24 March telecon - PORT Actions Miles, AJ \(Alistair\)
• RE: [ALL] proposed resolution httpRange-14 Miles, AJ \(Alistair\)
• RE : regrets for thursday telecon NANNI Marco RD-BIZZ-SOP
• Re: telecon regrets for thurs march 24 Thomas Baker
• Re: regrets for thursday telecon Benjamin Nguyen
• RE: RDFTM Disposition of Comments (RDFTM-DC001) Peter Patel-Schneider
• Re: RDFTM Disposition of Comments (RDFTM-DC001) Dan Brickley
• RE: RDFTM Disposition of Comments (RDFTM-DC001) Steve Pepper
• Re: comment - RDFTM: Survey of Interoperability Proposals Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Wednesday, 23 March 2005

• RE: RDFTM Disposition of Comments (RDFTM-DC001) Dan Connolly
• RE: RDFTM Disposition of Comments Steve Pepper
• Re: RDFTM comments: Swick Ralph R. Swick
• Re: meeting record: 2005-03-03 Boston F2F Ralph R. Swick
• Re: [ALL] proposed resolution httpRange-14 Dan Brickley
• Re: RDFTM Disposition of Comments Dan Connolly
• Re: [ALL] proposed resolution httpRange-14 Ralph R. Swick
• Re: comment - RDFTM: Survey of Interoperability Proposals Dan Brickley
• RDFTM Disposition of Comments Steve Pepper
• Re: meeting record: 2005-03-03 Boston F2F Christopher Welty
• RE: comment - RDFTM: Survey of Interoperability Proposals Steve Pepper
• Re: [ALL] agenda 24 March telecon Dan Brickley
• [ALL] agenda 24 March telecon Guus Schreiber
• Re: RDFTM: New draft of Survey Ralph R. Swick
• [ALL] proposal to publish XSCH WD Jeremy Carroll
• Re: [ALL] proposed resolution httpRange-14 Jeremy Carroll

Tuesday, 22 March 2005

• Re: telecon regrets for thurs march 24 Alan Rector
• RE: regrets for thursday telecon Steve Pepper
• RE: [ALL] proposed resolution httpRange-14 McBride, Brian
• regrets for Thursday 3/24 Govoni, Darren
• regrets for thursday telecon Natasha Noy
• Putting server added information to the result? Yoshio FUKUSHIGE
• telecon regrets for thurs march 24 DeborahL.McGuinness
• [action completion] W3C URI Persistence Policy Ralph R. Swick
• RE: [ALL] proposed resolution httpRange-14 Steve Pepper
• Re: [XSCH] new editors draft Jeremy Carroll
• Regrets for Thursday's telcon Lars Marius Garshol
• Re: [SE] Outcome to Telecon 16th March 2005 Jeff Pan
• [PORT] SKOS Core spec and guide (was RE: A problem RE: Dereferencing SKOS Core) Miles, AJ \(Alistair\)
• Re: meeting record: 2005-03-03 Boston F2F Ralph R. Swick
• Re: meeting record: 2005-03-03 Boston F2F Ivan Herman
• Re: meeting record: 2005-03-03 Boston F2F Dan Brickley
• meeting record: 2005-03-03 Boston F2F Ralph R. Swick

Saturday, 19 March 2005

• RE: RDFTM comments: Uschold Steve Pepper

Friday, 18 March 2005

• RDFTM comments: Uschold Steve Pepper
• RDFTM comments: Noy Steve Pepper
• RDFTM comments: Wood Steve Pepper
• RDFTM comments: Swick Steve Pepper
• RDFTM comments: DanC Steve Pepper
• comment on new draft of RDFTM Survey Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: [ALL] proposed resolution httpRange-14 Steve Pepper

Thursday, 17 March 2005

• RDFTM: New draft of Survey Steve Pepper
• [ALL] proposed resolution httpRange-14 Jeremy Carroll
• Re: [ALL] Re: [XSCH] new editors draft Jeff Pan
• Re: [ALL] Re: [XSCH] new editors draft ewallace@cme.nist.gov
• [ALL] Re: [XSCH] new editors draft Jeremy Carroll

Thursday, 6 November 2003

• [SE] Outcome to Telecon 16th March 2005 Phil Tetlow

Tuesday, 15 March 2005

• [SE] FYI SOFTWARE ENGINEERING AND FORMAL METHODS Uschold, Michael F
• Re: [XSCH] new editors draft Jeremy Carroll
• Re: [SE] Suggested agenda for next telecon (Tues 15th March 1pm EST) Daniel Oberle

Monday, 14 March 2005

• RE: comment - RDFTM: Survey of Interoperability Proposals Uschold, Michael F
• RE: [SE] Suggested agenda for next telecon (Tues 15th March 1pm EST) Uschold, Michael F
• Re: [XSCH] new editors draft Jeff Pan
• R:comment - RDFTM: Survey of Interoperability Proposals Valentina Presutti

Monday, 3 November 2003

• Fw: [SE] Suggested agenda for next telecon (Tues 15th March 1pm EST) Phil Tetlow

Sunday, 13 March 2005

• Re: comment - RDFTM: Survey of Interoperability Proposals Lars Marius Garshol
• RE: comment - RDFTM: Survey of Interoperability Proposals Steve Pepper
• RE: R:comment - RDFTM: Survey of Interoperability Proposals Steve Pepper

Saturday, 12 March 2005

• Re: R:comment - RDFTM: Survey of Interoperability Proposals Valentina Presutti

Friday, 11 March 2005

• [XSCH] new editors draft Jeremy Carroll
• FW: [Chat] UMBC Semantic Web Reference Card Uschold, Michael F
• [PORT] mapping Miles, AJ \(Alistair\)
• [ALL] new Editor's draft of classes as values available Christopher Welty
• [OEP] new Editor's draft of classes as values available Natasha Noy

Thursday, 10 March 2005

• RE: [OEP] Classes as Values - Abstract Uschold, Michael F
• R:comment - RDFTM: Survey of Interoperability Proposals Fabio Vitali

Wednesday, 9 March 2005

• Re: comment - RDFTM: Survey of Interoperability Proposals Patrick Durusau
• Re: [rdftm, port, etc] another example: William and Chet Guus Schreiber
• Re: [OEP] naming CaV patterns [was: new Editor's draft of classes as values available] Guus Schreiber
• RE: comment - RDFTM: Survey of Interoperability Proposals Bernard Vatant
• VM Task Force slides from f2f Ralph R. Swick
• RE: comment - RDFTM: Survey of Interoperability Proposals Uschold, Michael F
• Re: [SWBP]FAQ? Christopher Welty
• Re: [SWBP]FAQ? Jeremy Carroll
• Re: [SWBP]FAQ? ewallace@cme.nist.gov
• Re: [SWBP]FAQ? Guus Schreiber
• Re: comment - RDFTM: Survey of Interoperability Proposals Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• [SWBP]FAQ? Alan Rector
• RE: comment - RDFTM: Survey of Interoperability Proposals Bernard Vatant

Tuesday, 8 March 2005

• RE: [rdftm, port, etc] another example: William and Chet Bernard Vatant
• RE: [OEP] naming CaV patterns [was: new Editor's draft of classes as valuesavailable] Uschold, Michael F
• Re: [OEP] Classes as Values - Abstract Natasha Noy
• Re: [OEP] naming CaV patterns [was: new Editor's draft of classes as valuesavailable] Natasha Noy
• RE: [OEP] slightly reworked auto BillofMaterial for part-whole note Uschold, Michael F
• RE: [OEP] naming CaV patterns [was: new Editor's draft of classes as valuesavailable] Uschold, Michael F
• re:[OEP] slightly reworked auto BillofMaterial for part-whole note Evan K. Wallace
• [OEP] slightly reworked auto BillofMaterial for part-whole note Evan K. Wallace
• What do HTTP URIs Identify? Jeremy Carroll
• Re: [rdftm, port, etc] another example: William and Chet Dan Brickley
• [ALL] versioning Christopher Welty
• Re: [rdftm, port, etc] another example: William and Chet Christopher Welty
• RE: [OEP] naming CaV patterns [was: new Editor's draft of classes as values available] Christopher Welty
• RE: [OEP] new Editor's draft of classes as values available - TITLE of NOTE Christopher Welty
• comment - RDFTM: Survey of Interoperability Proposals Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: [OEP] new Editor's draft of classes as values available - TITLE of NOTE Uschold, Michael F
• RE: [OEP] new Editor's draft of classes as values available Uschold, Michael F
• [rdftm, port, etc] another example: William and Chet Dan Brickley
• RE: [OEP] Classes as Values - A detailed review Uschold, Michael F

Monday, 7 March 2005

• RE: [OEP] Comments on Specified Values Note Uschold, Michael F
• RE: [OEP] Comments on Specified Values Note Uschold, Michael F
• [ALL] March 10 telecon CANCELLED Guus Schreiber
• Re: possible DRAFT msg to TAG Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Specified values Alan Rector
• Re: [OEP] Comments on Specified Values Note Alan Rector
• Re: Specified values Christopher Welty
• Re: [OEP] Comments on Specified Values Note Christopher Welty

Sunday, 6 March 2005

• RE: possible DRAFT msg to TAG Steve Pepper
• RE: SW / ontology in telecommunication field Chiusano Joseph
• Specified values Alan Rector
• RE: SW / ontology in telecommunication field IC Dept.- MIT-Maqbool Al Maimani

Saturday, 5 March 2005

• Re: [OEP] Comments on Specified Values Note Uschold, Michael F
• [OEP] Action: Split out Note Conventions Uschold, Michael F
• [OEP, ALL] Naming Conventions for OWL code Uschold, Michael F
• Re: possible DRAFT msg to TAG Patrick Stickler
• Re: possible DRAFT msg to TAG Thomas Baker
• [OEP] new Editor's draft of classes as values available Natasha Noy
• [OEP] list of terms from the classes as values note Natasha Noy

Friday, 4 March 2005

• Re: possible DRAFT msg to TAG Jeremy Carroll
• Re: possible DRAFT msg to TAG Dan Brickley
• W3C Persistence Policy and SKOS Core Vocabulary spec Thomas Baker (E-mail)
• possible DRAFT msg to TAG Jeremy Carroll
• Re: [OEP] Classes as Values - A detailed review Natasha Noy
• Re: [OEP] Classes as Values - A detailed review Natasha Noy
• Re: [OEP] Classes as Values - A detailed review Christopher Welty
• Re: archived IRC log for the f2f Dan Brickley
• archived IRC log for the f2f Natasha Noy
• [Fwd: Re: Question scenario RDF in XHTML] Fabien Gandon
• RDFTM slides as presented by Steve Ralph R. Swick
• FW: [OEP] Classes as Values - A detailed review Uschold, Michael F
• RE: [OEP] Classes as Values - A detailed review Uschold, Michael F
• Re: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/XSCH/xsch-sw-20050127/ Jeff Pan
• RE: [OEP] Classes as Values - A detailed review Uschold, Michael F

Thursday, 3 March 2005

• Latest version of ODA note Phil Tetlow
• Re: [OEP] Classes as Values - A detailed review Natasha Noy
• RE: [OEP] Classes as Values - A detailed review Uschold, Michael F
• Re: [ALL] apdate #2: agenda Boston ftf DeborahL.McGuinness
• RE: [OEP] Classes as Values - A detailed review Uschold, Michael F
• RE: [SETF] recommended members Phil Tetlow
• RE: [SETF] recommended members Uschold, Michael F
• [SETF] recommended members Christopher Welty
• [OEP] simple part-whole note new draft Christopher Welty
• Latest version of SE Draft Phil Tetlow
• [RDFTM] comments on survey Ralph R. Swick
• Re: value partitions Alan Rector
• [Fwd: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender] Alan Rector
• Re: [OEP] Classes as Values - A detailed review Natasha Noy

Wednesday, 2 March 2005

• [OEP] Classes as Values - A detailed review Uschold, Michael F
• RE: Review of RDFTM Survey Steve Pepper
• Re: Review of RDFTM Survey David Wood
• [SE] More Comments on Draft Note David Wood
• [ALL] apdate #2: agenda Boston ftf Guus Schreiber
• Re: Review of RDFTM Survey Natasha Noy
• Re: [ALL] agenda (updated) Boston ftf Guus Schreiber
• RE: Review of RDFTM Survey Steve Pepper
• Re: Review of RDFTM Survey Natasha Noy
• Re: [SE] Draft Note - Initial changes following first informal meeting at tech plenary Jeff Pan
• Re: [SE] Comments on Draft Note Jeremy Carroll
• Re: [SE] Draft Note - Initial changes following first informal meeting at tech plenary Phil Tetlow
• Re: [SE] Comments on Draft Note Jeff Pan
• RFC 3066bis and the Semantic Web Addison Phillips
• Re: Review of RDFTM Survey Lars Marius Garshol
• Re: [RDFTM] Review of Survey Document Lars Marius Garshol
• Re: SWSE Phil Tetlow

Tuesday, 1 March 2005

• RE: [RDFTM] Review of Survey Document Uschold, Michael F
• Re: [RDFTM] Review of Survey Document Lars Marius Garshol
• RE: [OEP] Comments on Specified Values Note Uschold, Michael F
• [RDFTM] Review of Survey Document Uschold, Michael F
• Re: [ALL] agenda (updated) Boston ftf Dan Brickley
• Re: [OEP] Comments on Specified Values Note Christopher Welty
• RE: [ALL] agenda (updated) Boston ftf Miles, AJ \(Alistair\)
• Re: [OEP] Comments on Specified Values Note Alan Rector
• Re: [OEP] Comments on Specified Values Note Alan Rector
• Re: telco next week Phil Tetlow
• RE: [SE] Comments on Draft Note Daniel Oberle
• Re: [OEP] Comments on Specified Values Note Alan Rector

Last message date: Thursday, 31 March 2005 22:02:03 UTC