- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 16:31:15 +0000
- To: Jeff Pan <pan@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Cc: SWBPD <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
Jeff Pan wrote: > %%EDITORS' OPINION: Our preference is to use XPath eq despite it not being an equivalence > relation (the difference between the two relations can be captured by the approximation > mapping mapsTo). The advantage of this choice is the compatibility with XPath and > SPARQL. We hope that the implementation problems are resolvable. Jeremy Carroll, Jeff Pan Pleasant surprise. I was expecting you to disagree there since I imagine the implementation problems will be worse for OWL DL reasoners than others. I've been ill today, and this work has slipped further. (More later) Jeremy
Received on Tuesday, 15 March 2005 16:31:36 UTC