Re: possible DRAFT msg to TAG

• From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
• Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2005 10:09:06 +0000
• To: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
• Cc: public-swbp-wg@w3.org
• Message-ID: <422C2842.9020002@hplb.hpl.hp.com>

Patrick Stickler wrote:

> IMO, the message should finish up with something akin to
> 
> "In light of this decision by the WG, we ask the TAG to close
> issue httpRange-14 in a manner compatible with the unanimous
> view of the WG."
> 

I was thinking about the discomfort some WG participants had with the 
tone of the draft msg, and wondering if a final para that offered to 
work with the TAG might have softened the tone e.g.

"The SWBPD WG hope that the TAG will be able to soon reach closure on 
your issue httpRange-14, noting the current SW practice embodied in our 
resolution, and we offer to work with you as appropriate."

Jeremy

Received on Monday, 7 March 2005 10:13:23 UTC