- From: Uschold, Michael F <michael.f.uschold@boeing.com>
- Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 09:37:42 -0800
- To: <welty@us.ibm.com>, <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
Chris, Natasha, Alan: For the record, please note that we have identified a variety of material that is general across various notes, and ideally should be in one place, not scattered throughougt. Right now, Alan has diagramming conventions in the specified values note, (at least some of) which should also be in the classes as values note. Overall, this material includes: 1. glossary of terms 2. figure diagramming conventions 3. general criteria for evaluating patterns (interoperability, maintenance, semantic hacks, ...) 4. conventinso for prsenting code (i.e. N3) 5. [possible] naming convntisn for variavles, terms, etc in OWL code. Ideally, authors of current notes can try and do things as consistently as possible with existing notes, and document any new conventions as they emerge. Some of the material may even apply across multiple task forces. Mike
Received on Saturday, 5 March 2005 17:38:16 UTC