Monday, 31 October 2011
- Re: prov-o example relations
- Re: prov-dm attributes: two proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT)
- Re: prov-dm expression: a proposal to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT)
- Re: vocabulary simplification: two proposals to vote on [deadline, Oct 26 midnight, GMT]
- Re: prov-o example relations
- Re: prov-o example relations
- Re: prov-dm attributes: two proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT)
Sunday, 30 October 2011
- Re: prov-o example relations
- Re: about EntityInRole and assumedBy
- prov-dm attributes: two proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT)
- Re: about EntityInRole and assumedBy
- PROV-ISSUE-139 (collection-emptylist): Collections don't provide a way to specify empty lists [Data Model]
- Re: prov-o example relations
Saturday, 29 October 2011
- Re: Blog Post: 5 Simple Provenance Statements
- PROV-ISSUE-138 (collection-collision): Collection does not describe multiple additions/replacements [Data Model]
- PROV-ISSUE-137 (collection-isolation): Collection assertions does not guarantee isolation [Data Model]
- PROV-ISSUE-136 (collection-functional): Collection not stated as functional [Data Model]
- PROV-ISSUE-135 (collection-names): Collection relations have confusing names [Data Model]
- Re: prov-dm expression: a proposal to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT)
Friday, 28 October 2011
- Re: prov-o example relations
- Re: prov-o example relations
- Re: prov-dm expression: a proposal to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT)
- prov-o example relations
- Re: about EntityInRole and assumedBy
- Re: prov-dm expression: a proposal to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT)
- Re: about EntityInRole and assumedBy
- Re: prov-dm expression: a proposal to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT)
- Re: prov-dm expression: a proposal to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT)
- prov-dm expression: a proposal to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT)
- Re: about EntityInRole and assumedBy
- Re: about EntityInRole and assumedBy
- Re: about EntityInRole and assumedBy
- Re: about EntityInRole and assumedBy
Thursday, 27 October 2011
- Re: vocabulary simplification: two proposals to vote on [deadline, Oct 26 midnight, GMT]
- Fwd: vocabulary simplification: two proposals to vote on [deadline, Oct 26 midnight, GMT]
- Re: vocabulary simplification: two proposals to vote on [deadline, Oct 26 midnight, GMT]
- Re: vocabulary simplification: two proposals to vote on [deadline, Oct 26 midnight, GMT]
- Re: vocabulary simplification: two proposals to vote on [deadline, Oct 26 midnight, GMT]
Wednesday, 26 October 2011
- Re: vocabulary simplification: two proposals to vote on [deadline, Oct 26 midnight, GMT]
- Re: vocabulary simplification: two proposals to vote on [deadline, Oct 26 midnight, GMT]
- Re: vocabulary simplification: two proposals to vote on [deadline, Oct 26 midnight, GMT]
- Re: vocabulary simplification: two proposals to vote on [deadline, Oct 26 midnight, GMT]
- Re: writing a simple example in prov-o, help
- Re: vocabulary simplification: two proposals to vote on [deadline, Oct 26 midnight, GMT]
- Re: vocabulary simplification: two proposals to vote on [deadline, Oct 26 midnight, GMT]
- Re: vocabulary simplification: two proposals to vote on [deadline, Oct 26 midnight, GMT]
- Re: vocabulary simplification: two proposals to vote on [deadline, Oct 26 midnight, GMT]
- Re: vocabulary simplification: two proposals to vote on [deadline, Oct 26 midnight, GMT]
- Re: vocabulary simplification: two proposals to vote on [deadline, Oct 26 midnight, GMT]
- Re: vocabulary simplification: two proposals to vote on [deadline, Oct 26 midnight, GMT]
- Re: vocabulary simplification: two proposals to vote on [deadline, Oct 26 midnight, GMT]
- Re: vocabulary simplification: two proposals to vote on [deadline, Oct 26 midnight, GMT]
- Re: writing a simple example in prov-o, help
- Re: about EntityInRole and assumedBy
- Re: writing a simple example in prov-o, help
- Re: about EntityInRole and assumedBy
- Re: vocabulary simplification: two proposals to vote on [deadline, Oct 26 midnight, GMT]
- Re: vocabulary simplification: two proposals to vote on [deadline, Oct 26 midnight, GMT]
- Re: vocabulary simplification: two proposals to vote on [deadline, Oct 26 midnight, GMT]
- Re: vocabulary simplification: two proposals to vote on [deadline, Oct 26 midnight, GMT]
- Re: vocabulary simplification: two proposals to vote on [deadline, Oct 26 midnight, GMT]
- Re: writing a simple example in prov-o, help
- Re: vocabulary simplification: two proposals to vote on [deadline, Oct 26 midnight, GMT]
- about EntityInRole and assumedBy
- Re: vocabulary simplification: two proposals to vote on [deadline, Oct 26 midnight, GMT]
- Re: vocabulary simplification: two proposals to vote on [deadline, Oct 26 midnight, GMT]
- Re: vocabulary simplification: two proposals to vote on [deadline, Oct 26 midnight, GMT]
- Re: writing a simple example in prov-o, help
- Re: PROV-WG: Agenda for October 27 Telecon
- Re: vocabulary simplification: two proposals to vote on [deadline, Oct 26 midnight, GMT]
- Re: vocabulary simplification: two proposals to vote on [deadline, Oct 26 midnight, GMT]
- Re: vocabulary simplification: two proposals to vote on [deadline, Oct 26 midnight, GMT]
- Re: Blog Post: 5 Simple Provenance Statements
- Re: vocabulary simplification: two proposals to vote on [deadline, Oct 26 midnight, GMT]
- Re: writing a simple example in prov-o, help
- Re: PROV-WG: Agenda for October 27 Telecon
- Re: writing a simple example in prov-o, help
- Re: writing a simple example in prov-o, help
- Re: writing a simple example in prov-o, help
- Re: vocabulary simplification: two proposals to vote on [deadline, Oct 26 midnight, GMT]
- Re: vocabulary simplification: two proposals to vote on [deadline, Oct 26 midnight, GMT]
Tuesday, 25 October 2011
- Re: vocabulary simplification: two proposals to vote on [deadline, Oct 26 midnight, GMT]
- Re: vocabulary simplification: two proposals to vote on [deadline, Oct 26 midnight, GMT]
- Re: Prov-o call on Monday 12:00noon US ET
- Re: writing a simple example in prov-o, help
- Re: Prov-o call on Monday 12:00noon US ET
- Re: Blog Post: 5 Simple Provenance Statements
- Re: vocabulary simplification: two proposals to vote on [deadline, Oct 26 midnight, GMT]
- PROV-WG: Agenda for October 27 Telecon
- PROV-WG Minutes Oct 20, 2011
- Re: Prov-o call on Monday 12:00noon US ET
- Re: Prov-o call on Monday 12:00noon US ET
- Re: Prov-o call on Monday 12:00noon US ET
- Re: Prov-o call on Monday 12:00noon US ET
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-134: Non-Human Agent vs. Human Agent [Data Model]
- Re: Prov-o call on Monday 12:00noon US ET
- Re: Prov-o call on Monday 12:00noon US ET
- Re: Prov-o call on Monday 12:00noon US ET
- Re: Prov-o call on Monday 12:00noon US ET
- Re: Prov-o call on Monday 12:00noon US ET
- Re: Prov-o call on Monday 12:00noon US ET
- Re: Prov-o call on Monday 12:00noon US ET
- Re: Prov-o call on Monday 12:00noon US ET
- Re: writing a simple example in prov-o, help
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-134: Non-Human Agent vs. Human Agent [Data Model]
- Re: Blog Post: 5 Simple Provenance Statements
- Re: Prov-o call on Monday 12:00noon US ET
- Re: Prov-o call on Monday 12:00noon US ET
Monday, 24 October 2011
- Re: Prov-o call on Monday 12:00noon US ET
- Re: Prov-o call on Monday 12:00noon US ET
- Re: Prov-o call on Monday 12:00noon US ET
- Re: Prov-o call on Monday 12:00noon US ET
- Re: Prov-o call on Monday 12:00noon US ET
- Re: Prov-o call on Monday 12:00noon US ET
- Re: Prov-o call on Monday 12:00noon US ET
- Re: Prov-o call on Monday 12:00noon US ET
- Re: Prov-o call on Monday 12:00noon US ET
- Re: Prov-o call on Monday 12:00noon US ET
- Re: Some OGC Member comments on the current model
- Re: Prov-o call on Monday 12:00noon US ET
- Re: Prov-o call on Monday 12:00noon US ET
- Re: Prov-o call on Monday 12:00noon US ET
- RE: Some OGC Member comments on the current model
- Re: Prov-o call on Monday 12:00noon US ET
- Important! Fwd: Daylight Savings Time change
- RE: writing a simple example in prov-o, help
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-132 (YolandaGil): Improve the examples to make them more intuitive and of broader appeal in Provenance Data Model (PROV-DM) Draft [Data Model]
- Re: Prov-o call on Monday 12:00noon US ET
- PROV-WG get together at ISWC
- Re: Prov-o call on Monday 12:00noon US ET
- Re: Prov-o call on Monday 12:00noon US ET
- Re: writing a simple example in prov-o, help
- Re: Prov-o call on Monday 12:00noon US ET
- Prov-o call on Monday 12:00noon US ET
Sunday, 23 October 2011
- PROV-ISSUE-134: Non-Human Agent vs. Human Agent [Data Model]
- Re: vocabulary simplification: two proposals to vote on [deadline, Oct 26 midnight, GMT]
- Re: vocabulary simplification: two proposals to vote on [deadline, Oct 26 midnight, GMT]
- Blog Post: 5 Simple Provenance Statements
Saturday, 22 October 2011
Friday, 21 October 2011
- Re: writing a simple example in prov-o, help
- Re: writing a simple example in prov-o, help
- Re: writing a simple example in prov-o, help
- Re: ISSUE-111: Create properties prov:hadLocation and prov:assumedBy
- Re: Some thoughts about the revised provenance Model document
- Re: Serializations, mappings, and equivalence
- Re: writing a simple example in prov-o, help
- Re: Serializations, mappings, and equivalence
- writing a simple example in prov-o, help
- Serializations, mappings, and equivalence
- Re: Some thoughts about the revised provenance Model document
- Re: Some thoughts about the revised provenance Model document
- Re: Provenance and properties of entities in RDF
- Published prov-dm - entities and attributes, and a couple of editorial comments
Thursday, 20 October 2011
- PROV-ISSUE-133 (YolandaGil): Producing and delivering resources as part of provenance in Provenance Data Model (PROV-DM) Draft [Data Model]
- PROV-ISSUE-132 (YolandaGil): Improve the examples to make them more intuitive and of broader appeal in Provenance Data Model (PROV-DM) Draft [Data Model]
- PROV-ISSUE-131 (YolandaGil): Simplify the references to "recipe" in Provenance Data Model (PROV-DM) Draft [Data Model]
- PROV-ISSUE-130 (YolandaGil): Definition and examples of "agent" should be clarified in Provenance Data Model (PROV-DM) Draft [Data Model]
- PROV-ISSUE-129 (YolandaGil): Definitions of "Activity"/"Event"/"ProcessExecution" should be more crisp and differentiable in Provenance Data Model (PROV-DM) Draft [Data Model]
- Comments on Provenance Data Model (PROV-DM) Draft
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-104 (time-class): How to relate start/end time to PE, use, generation, etc [Formal Model]
- RE: Some thoughts about the revised provenance Model document
- Regrets
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-90 (namespace-in-ontology): Namespace used in ontology [Formal Model]
- Re: Comments on the prov-dm document
- Re: Comments on the prov-dm document
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-90 (namespace-in-ontology): Namespace used in ontology [Formal Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-90 (namespace-in-ontology): Namespace used in ontology [Formal Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-90 (namespace-in-ontology): Namespace used in ontology [Formal Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-90 (namespace-in-ontology): Namespace used in ontology [Formal Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-90 (namespace-in-ontology): Namespace used in ontology [Formal Model]
- Re: Provenance and properties of entities in RDF
- Re: Comments on the prov-dm document
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-90 (namespace-in-ontology): Namespace used in ontology [Formal Model]
- Re: Some thoughts about the revised provenance Model document
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-90 (namespace-in-ontology): Namespace used in ontology [Formal Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-90 (namespace-in-ontology): Namespace used in ontology [Formal Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-90 (namespace-in-ontology): Namespace used in ontology [Formal Model]
- Provenance and properties of entities in RDF
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-90 (namespace-in-ontology): Namespace used in ontology [Formal Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-90 (namespace-in-ontology): Namespace used in ontology [Formal Model]
- Re: Some thoughts about the revised provenance Model document
- Re: Some thoughts about the revised provenance Model document
- PROV-ISSUE-128 (Location-Example): Location example uses a filesystem and not a geographical location [Ontology]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-90 (namespace-in-ontology): Namespace used in ontology [Formal Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-114 (Tlebo): is prov:wasDerivedFrom rdfs:subPropertyOf prov:dependedOn? [Formal Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-114 (Tlebo): is prov:wasDerivedFrom rdfs:subPropertyOf prov:dependedOn? [Formal Model]
Wednesday, 19 October 2011
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-90 (namespace-in-ontology): Namespace used in ontology [Formal Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-90 (namespace-in-ontology): Namespace used in ontology [Formal Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-90 (namespace-in-ontology): Namespace used in ontology [Formal Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-112 (prov-in-get): provenance information in GET message [Accessing and Querying Provenance]
- Re: Some thoughts about the revised provenance Model document
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-114 (Tlebo): is prov:wasDerivedFrom rdfs:subPropertyOf prov:dependedOn? [Formal Model]
- Re: PROV-WG: Owl call
- Comments on the prov-dm document
- PROV-WG: Agenda Oct 20, 2011
- Re: Connection TF report, agenda item
- Connection TF report, agenda item
Tuesday, 18 October 2011
- Minutes of meeting from PROV ontology group
- Blog post up on PROV-DM
- RE: Some thoughts about the revised provenance Model document
- prov-dm fpwd
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-104 (time-class): How to relate start/end time to PE, use, generation, etc [Formal Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-104 (time-class): How to relate start/end time to PE, use, generation, etc [Formal Model]
Monday, 17 October 2011
- Re: Some thoughts about the revised provenance Model document
- Meeting minutes 2011-10-13
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-112 (prov-in-get): provenance information in GET message [Accessing and Querying Provenance]
- Re: Some thoughts about the revised provenance Model document
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-104 (time-class): How to relate start/end time to PE, use, generation, etc [Formal Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-112 (prov-in-get): provenance information in GET message [Accessing and Querying Provenance]
- OWL Time references and diagram
- Re: Weekly Connection Task Force Call - each Monday
- PROV-ISSUE-127: Constraint id= participation (PROV DM and PROV ontology) [Data Model]
- Re: Some thoughts about the revised provenance Model document
Sunday, 16 October 2011
- Re: Weekly Connection Task Force Call - each Monday
- Re: Weekly Connection Task Force Call - each Monday
- Re: [PROV-O] issues in document
- PROV-ISSUE-126: Section 5.3.3.2 "Process Execution Independent Derivation Expression." [Data Model]
Saturday, 15 October 2011
Friday, 14 October 2011
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-104 (time-class): How to relate start/end time to PE, use, generation, etc [Formal Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-104 (time-class): How to relate start/end time to PE, use, generation, etc [Formal Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-104 (time-class): How to relate start/end time to PE, use, generation, etc [Formal Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-104 (time-class): How to relate start/end time to PE, use, generation, etc [Formal Model]
Thursday, 13 October 2011
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-104 (time-class): How to relate start/end time to PE, use, generation, etc [Formal Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-104 (time-class): How to relate start/end time to PE, use, generation, etc [Formal Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-104 (time-class): How to relate start/end time to PE, use, generation, etc [Formal Model]
- Re: [PROV-O] Time examples?
- [PROV-O] issues in document
- [PROV-O] Time examples?
- Re: PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 13 Oct 2011
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-90 (namespace-in-ontology): Namespace used in ontology [Formal Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-122: Constraint on wasGeneratedBy (PROV-DM and PROV-OM) [Conceptual Model]
Wednesday, 12 October 2011
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-122: Constraint on wasGeneratedBy (PROV-DM and PROV-OM) [Conceptual Model]
- Re: Comments of PROV-DM document (Section 2.1 and 3)
- Re: Comments of PROV-DM document (Section 2.1 and 3)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-90 (namespace-in-ontology): Namespace used in ontology [Formal Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-90 (namespace-in-ontology): Namespace used in ontology [Formal Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-90 (namespace-in-ontology): Namespace used in ontology [Formal Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-90 (namespace-in-ontology): Namespace used in ontology [Formal Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-90 (namespace-in-ontology): Namespace used in ontology [Formal Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-90 (namespace-in-ontology): Namespace used in ontology [Formal Model]
- Re: Comments of PROV-DM document (Section 2.1 and 3)
- Re: Comments of PROV-DM document (Section 2.1 and 3)
Tuesday, 11 October 2011
- Re: Comments of PROV-DM document (Section 2.1 and 3)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-124: Constraints on Used Relation (PROV-DM and PROV-OM) [Conceptual Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-122: Constraint on wasGeneratedBy (PROV-DM and PROV-OM) [Conceptual Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-124: Constraints on Used Relation (PROV-DM and PROV-OM) [Conceptual Model]
- PROV-ISSUE-124: Constraints on Used Relation (PROV-DM and PROV-OM) [Conceptual Model]
- Re: PROV-WG: Owl call
- Re: Comments on the current data model
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-115 (Tlebo): prov:preceded should be replaced with prov:followed [Formal Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-122: Constraint on wasGeneratedBy (PROV-DM and PROV-OM) [Conceptual Model]
- Re: Comments on the current data model
- PROV-ISSUE-123 (hadParticipant-subprops): prov:used and prov:wasControlledby should be subproperties of prov:hadParticipant
- Re: Comments on the current data model
- PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 13 Oct 2011
- Re: PROV-WG: Owl call
- Re: PROV-WG: Owl call
- PROV-WG: Owl call
- Re: PROV-ONT: Name for what was the formal model
- Re: PROV-ONT: Name for what was the formal model
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-122: Constraint on wasGeneratedBy (PROV-DM and PROV-OM) [Conceptual Model]
- Re: PROV-ONT: Name for what was the formal model
Monday, 10 October 2011
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-122: Constraint on wasGeneratedBy (PROV-DM and PROV-OM) [Conceptual Model]
- Re: PROV-ONT: Name for what was the formal model
- Re: Comments on the current data model
- Re: PROV-ONT: Name for what was the formal model
- Re: PROV-ONT: Name for what was the formal model
- Prov-wg: meeting minutes Oct. 6 2011
- PROV-ONT: Name for what was the formal model
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-122: Constraint on wasGeneratedBy (PROV-DM and PROV-OM) [Conceptual Model]
- Re: Comments on the current data model
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-122: Constraint on wasGeneratedBy (PROV-DM and PROV-OM) [Conceptual Model]
- Re: Comments of PROV-DM document (Section 2.1 and 3)
- Re: Comments on the current data model
Sunday, 9 October 2011
- PROV-ISSUE-122: Constraint on wasGeneratedBy (PROV-DM and PROV-OM) [Conceptual Model]
- PROV-ISSUE-121: Constraint on PE (PROV-DM and PROV-OM) [Conceptual Model]
Friday, 7 October 2011
Thursday, 6 October 2011
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-119 (vanilla-rdf): How does vanilla RDF work with PROV Ontology [Formal Model]
- PROV-ISSUE-120 (Tlebo): Renaming Formal Model (The OWL) [Formal Model]
- Re: Scribe needed!
- Scribe needed!
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-119 (vanilla-rdf): How does vanilla RDF work with PROV Ontology [Formal Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-119 (vanilla-rdf): How does vanilla RDF work with PROV Ontology [Formal Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-119 (vanilla-rdf): How does vanilla RDF work with PROV Ontology [Formal Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-117 (general-comments-on-formal-model-document): General Comments On Ontology Document [Formal Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-118 (shortcuts-in-provont): Ontology Does not model Shortcuts [Formal Model]
- PROV-ISSUE-119 (vanilla-rdf): How does vanilla RDF work with PROV Ontology [Formal Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-117 (general-comments-on-formal-model-document): General Comments On Ontology Document [Formal Model]
- PROV-ISSUE-118 (shortcuts-in-provont): Ontology Does not model Shortcuts [Formal Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-117 (general-comments-on-formal-model-document): General Comments On Ontology Document [Formal Model]
- comments on ontology and on ontology document
- PROV-ISSUE-117 (general-comments-on-formal-model-document): General Comments On Ontology Document [Formal Model]
- PROV-ISSUE-116 (general-comments-on-ontology): General Comments On Ontology [Formal Model]
- First release of the PROV Ontology Model document
Wednesday, 5 October 2011
- Re: mercurial problem
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-115 (Tlebo): prov:preceded should be replaced with prov:followed [Formal Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-115 (Tlebo): prov:preceded should be replaced with prov:followed [Formal Model]
- Re: mercurial problem
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-114 (Tlebo): is prov:wasDerivedFrom rdfs:subPropertyOf prov:dependedOn? [Formal Model]
- PROV-ISSUE-115 (Tlebo): prov:preceded should be replaced with prov:followed [Formal Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-114 (Tlebo): is prov:wasDerivedFrom rdfs:subPropertyOf prov:dependedOn? [Formal Model]
- mercurial problem
Tuesday, 4 October 2011
- PROV-ISSUE-114 (Tlebo): is prov:wasDerivedFrom rdfs:subPropertyOf prov:dependedOn? [Formal Model]
- Re: Liaison to W3C Provenance Working Group
- RE: Some thoughts about the revised provenance Model document
- RE: Some thoughts about the revised provenance Model document
- Re: ISSUE-110: Renaming prov:Role -> prov:EntityInRole
- Re: ISSUE-110: Renaming prov:Role -> prov:EntityInRole
- PROV-ISSUE-113: wasScheduledAfter is transitive [Conceptual Model]
- Re: ISSUE-110: Renaming prov:Role -> prov:EntityInRole
- Re: ISSUE-111: Create properties prov:hadLocation and prov:assumedBy
- Re: ISSUE-111: Create properties prov:hadLocation and prov:assumedBy
- Re: ISSUE-109: Stian update hadRecipe to have range prov:Recipe - not defined any further
- PROV-WG: Agenda Oct. 06 2011
- Re: ISSUE-109: Stian update hadRecipe to have range prov:Recipe - not defined any further
- PROV-ISSUE-112 (prov-in-get): provenance information in GET message [Accessing and Querying Provenance]
Monday, 3 October 2011
- Re: ISSUE-111: Create properties prov:hadLocation and prov:assumedBy
- ISSUE-111: Create properties prov:hadLocation and prov:assumedBy
- ISSUE-110: Renaming prov:Role -> prov:EntityInRole
- ISSUE-109: Stian update hadRecipe to have range prov:Recipe - not defined any further
- Re: proposal: drop 'formal model' terminology
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-106 (dgarijo): Accounts are missing in the document [Formal Model]
- Re: proposal: drop 'formal model' terminology
- PROV-ISSUE-108 (transitivity-of-dependedOn): derivations must take into account characterization intervals [Conceptual Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-50 (Ordering of Process): Defintion for Ordering of Process [Conceptual Model]
- Re: Workflow Example in Formal Model HTML document
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-50 (Ordering of Process): Defintion for Ordering of Process [Conceptual Model]
Sunday, 2 October 2011
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-50 (Ordering of Process): Defintion for Ordering of Process [Conceptual Model]
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-45: isDerivedFrom and IVPof are transitive. [Conceptual Model]
- Re: proposal: drop 'formal model' terminology
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-50 (Ordering of Process): Defintion for Ordering of Process [Conceptual Model]