- From: Khalid Belhajjame <Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2011 10:52:46 +0100
- To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- CC: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Yes please. Go ahead and close it. Thanks, khalid On 22/08/2011 22:04, Luc Moreau wrote: > > Hi Khalid, > This issue was closed, pending review. > Are you satisfied with the changes? Can we > close it? Alternatively, you can reopen it, > or create a more specific issue. > Thanks, > Luc > > PS See note on this issue's page > > > > On 24/07/11 11:59, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >> PROV-ISSUE-45: isDerivedFrom and IVPof are transitive. [Conceptual >> Model] >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/45 >> >> Raised by: Khalid Belhajjame >> On product: Conceptual Model >> >> >> If we agree that “isDerivedFrom” and “IVPof” are transitive, then I >> would suggest that this should be specified in the model working draft. >> >> khalid >> >> >> >> >> > >
Received on Sunday, 2 October 2011 09:53:22 UTC