- From: Jim McCusker <mccusj@rpi.edu>
- Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 15:51:39 -0400
- To: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- Cc: "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 10 October 2011 19:52:33 UTC
In the OWL call today we seemed to settle on PROV-O (Provenance Ontology), since it's pronounceable and simple. Yes, it's a city name, but that hasn't stopped other ontologies in the past. Jim On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl> wrote: > Hi All, > > Given that we no longer want to call the provenance ontology "the formal > model" we wanted another name: > > Here are some proposals: > > PROV Ontology Model (also PROV ontology) > PROV-Onto > PROV Vocabulary > > Please send your suggestion/endorsement/**thoughts in on this thread. We > will try and get consensus this week. > > Thanks, > Paul > > > > > -- Jim McCusker Programmer Analyst Krauthammer Lab, Pathology Informatics Yale School of Medicine james.mccusker@yale.edu | (203) 785-6330 http://krauthammerlab.med.yale.edu PhD Student Tetherless World Constellation Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute mccusj@cs.rpi.edu http://tw.rpi.edu
Received on Monday, 10 October 2011 19:52:33 UTC